Discussion Board

Actor Mohanlal booked for possessing ivory


Total 33 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2
suppandi
w
by suppandi on Jun 15, 2012 02:38 PM  | Hide replies

Surely Lal will come out clean from this conspiracy

    Forward  |  Report abuse
raghu raj
Re: w
by raghu raj on Jun 15, 2012 03:01 PM
Yes Suppandi_will save_him.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jayjay
Re: Re: w
by jayjay on Jun 15, 2012 03:04 PM
there is one more person to be arrested for spreading hatred in public forums...it is the great Mr.Suthandi

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
dicktracy
Re: w
by dicktracy on Jun 18, 2012 11:05 AM
Correct, it will be proved that those tusks dont belong to elephants but are really bulls horns painted white!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Pat Thakur
Paid Publicity.....
by Pat Thakur on Jun 15, 2012 02:21 PM  | Hide replies

For his movie discussed elsewhere in another writeup on this blog.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
K Vemu
He must declare it I guess.
by K Vemu on Jun 15, 2012 01:54 PM  | Hide replies

If he declared it in past he doesnt have to again.
If he declared it he could have shown it (receipt) at the time of booking.
If he lost the receipt, he could have used his witness to concur.
If his witness was not present, he could have asked for a check into registry and confirmation.
If he failed all of the above, he can still settle it by (proving, he did not hunt the elephant, he only purchased it from an illegal vendor, and can return the merchandize).
If he couldnt locate the vendor, he can claim a finders keepers and pay the fines due.
If he couldnt claim it under IPC, he can let the officials seize the item (and forfeit interest).
If the officials do not accept the forfeiture, he can reapply another tax declaration and proceed with necessary procedures.
If the officials do not accept such process, he can drop it in a dumpster and walk away.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
K Vemu
Re: He must declare it I guess.
by K Vemu on Jun 15, 2012 01:58 PM
But still the fair trial procedure allows for a complete examination of the case under IPC and all relevant arguments must be heard in detail before any conclusions are drawn. Without any deliberations, nobody can really tell who's at fault.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
K Vemu
Re: Re: He must declare it I guess.
by K Vemu on Jun 15, 2012 02:03 PM
Insurance industry wanted to see the MJ who dared to dream skin.
Derms wanted to check if he's competent for a perfect one.
Failed? Put surveilliance but follow procedures.
Better yet, recommend a thorough check after, because even survielliance was bought out!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
SX
Re: s
by SX on Jun 15, 2012 02:22 PM
wah wah.. you and your brains!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
thu tha
This is not fair
by thu tha on Jun 15, 2012 01:22 PM  | Hide replies

elephants will have ivory

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
guruji
Re: Re: This is not fair
by guruji on Jun 15, 2012 01:59 PM
So what is your problem Supps - Why don't you also adopt an ape from your home state? You feeling jealous about that?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
suppandi
Re: Re: Re: This is not fair
by suppandi on Jun 15, 2012 02:24 PM
No problem for me sir, I just pointed out one such instance

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
dicktracy
Re: Re: Re: This is not fair
by dicktracy on Jun 18, 2012 11:17 AM
Would it be possible for a son to adopt his monkey dad? Then the son would be the monkeys fosterdad and vice versa!. Mindboggling

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 33 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2
Write a message