A man who gave 15 consecutive hits and was superstar for 6 years could not have been short of talent. It is easy to pick up parts of anyone's life where he was not so great and present an unpalatable serving, but that is not an accurate assessment. Agreed he did not handle success and failure well, but that is no reason to bad mouth him using anonymous contemporaries as sniping points. The article is a cheap attempt to demean kaka's legacy. You can't be luck for so long as to be conferred superstar status. lucky are the Kumar gauravs and Chandrachur's and Abhishek Bachchans, not someone who reigns as the ultimate star for longer than Parliament term lasts! perhaps Kaka could have done with better advisors.
Re: Incorrect
by Ravthiraman on Jul 23, 2012 06:33 PM
Fully AGREE!...This article has been written by someone who could not digest the respect and love that Kaka got last week as he used to get in his hey days!!!
I kind of agree with the writer. Although I don't really know if this is a good time to bring it up. I think a Shah Rukh or a Salman also may have similar issues which is why they have fallen out with almost every other big banner in the industry other than their own favorites. I think the article is quite realistic and believable.
Re: disgusting marketing tactics
by Akash Nair on Jul 23, 2012 06:15 PM
Dude get over this entitlement mentality! Why do you want everything for free? Can anybody walk into your house and take things for free?
Re: sunil sethi
by ACHINTA ROY on Jul 23, 2012 01:24 PM
First acknowledge the fact that this useless fellow, as projected by the writer, gave 15 consecutive superhits. Please appreciate that talent may not be always graceful. It is expressed when situation demands. These sort of foolish attempts to derogate the charismatic, immensely talented kaka, will be dumped in the dustbin. It is advisable that these people should watch him closely in Aradhana, Anand and Namak Haram once again to understand why he was so successful in the other films.
