Re: Re: has kareena exposed in this movie in some scene?
by lucyama on Feb 13, 2012 11:55 PM
:( bad luck! ideally speaking there should be some one hot scene in such movies like she raising her armssand showing herarmpithair or something
First it was Arth, then 'Luck by Chance', then 'Wake Up Sid', then this one, we as audience still have problem accepting the unconventional. Coming of age films makes us uncomfortable('Dil Chahta Hai',Wake up Sid' were exception but even they had very slow starts and only did well later on thanks to mouth of publicity). It is strange and rather unfortunate that even in this decade a 'Dabang' or a 'Bodyguard' that have female leads reduced to just having to look pretty, get quick numbers at the box office - just 2 days into the release, they are declared as blockbusters whereas movies trying to break new grounds have to struggle getting numbers and only qualify for becoming what are known as "sleeper hits". Hollywood is not much better either. A 'Bridesmaid' or 'The Descendants' would be lucky to even cross the $50 million mark whereas a brainless Cruise starrer 'Misson Impossible' gets a $100 million in just two days. Sad to see most comments on this thread. No one here cared to say anything about the unconventional ending - perhaps the makers should have played safe by making it more conventional -not trying to break ground rules and if they had to, they should have resorted to the usual shock therapy - a weapon so effectively used by Milan Luthria ('The Dity Picture') and Madhur Bhandarkar ('Page 3'). The Hindi film industry may be the most profitable one in the world but in terms of maturity, it is probably even behind the Iranian
Re: Unconnetional - still not acceptable
by Anwar Ali on Feb 12, 2012 01:25 AM
Yes......all of us like to see Unconventional but you have to agree that people go to theatres to see entertainment. Unconventional is happening everyday in our life. Why go to see another one? Dirty Picture could have fallen in the same category had it not shown s e x and foul languages. You need to be practical. We will see unconventional at home in DVD or will want them to get plenty of awards, but sorry, cannot go in theatres to watch them.
Re: Unconnetional - still not acceptable
by Anwar Ali on Feb 12, 2012 01:34 AM
But do not worry Shounak. Tell the Khans not to do any crazy marketing of their own films and we will see they are flop too. They are just successful in creating the hype before the movie. See Agneepath. One of the worst film made so much money by making fool out of the public.
First it was Arth, then 'Luck by Chance', then 'Wake Up Sid', then this one, we as audience still have problem accepting the unconventional. Coming of age films makes us uncomfortable('Dil Chahta Hai',Wake up Sid' were exception but even they had very slow starts and only did well later on thanks to mouth of publicity). It is strange and rather unfortunate that even in this decade a 'Dabang' or a 'Bodyguard' that have female leads reduced to just having to look pretty, get quick numbers at the box office - just 2 days into the release, they are declared as blockbusters whereas movies trying to break new grounds have to struggle getting numbers and only qualify for becoming what are known as "sleeper hits". Hollywood is not much better either. A 'Bridesmaid' or 'The Descendants' would be lucky to even cross the $50 million mark whereas a brainless Cruise starrer 'Misson Impossible' gets a $100 million in just two days. Sad to see most comments on this thread. No one here cared to say anything about the unconventional ending - perhaps the makers should have played safe by making it more conventional -not trying to break ground rules and if they had to, they should have resorted to the usual shock therapy - a weapon so effectively used by Milan Luthria ('The Dity Picture') and Madhur Bhandarkar ('Page 3'). The Hindi film industry may be the most profitable one in the world but in terms of maturity, it is probably even behind the Iranian
First it was Arth, then 'Luck by Chance', then 'Wake Up Sid', then this one, we as audience still have problem accepting the unconventional. Coming of age films makes us uncomfortable('Dil Chahta Hai',Wake up Sid' were exception but even they had very slow starts and only did well later on thanks to mouth of publicity). It is strange and rather unfortunate that even in this decade a 'Dabang' or a 'Bodyguard' that have female leads reduced to just having to look pretty, get quick numbers at the box office - just 2 days into the release, they are declared as blockbusters whereas movies trying to break new grounds have to struggle getting numbers and only qualify for becoming what are known as "sleeper hits". Hollywood is not much better either. A 'Bridesmaid' or 'The Descendants' would be lucky to even cross the $50 million mark whereas a brainless Cruise starrer 'Misson Impossible' gets a $100 million in just two days. Sad to see most comments on this thread. No one here cared to say anything about the unconventional ending - perhaps the makers should have played safe by making it more conventional -not trying to break ground rules and if they had to, they should have resorted to the usual shock therapy - a weapon so effectively used by Milan Luthria ('The Dity Picture') and Madhur Bhandarkar ('Page 3'). The Hindi film industry may be the most profitable one in the world but in terms of maturity, it is probably even behind the Iranian and Pakistani industri
First it was Arth, then 'Luck by Chance', then 'Wake Up Sid', then this one, we as audience still have problem accepting the unconventional. Coming of age films makes us uncomfortable('Dil Chahta Hai',Wake up Sid' were exception but even they had very slow starts and only did well later on thanks to mouth of publicity). It is strange and rather unfortunate that even in this decade a 'Dabang' or a 'Bodyguard' that have female leads reduced to just having to look pretty, get quick numbers at the box office - just 2 days into the release, they are declared as blockbusters whereas movies trying to break new grounds have to struggle getting numbers and only qualify for becoming what are known as "sleeper hits". Hollywood is not much better either. A 'Bridesmaid' or 'The Descendants' would be lucky to even cross the $50 million mark whereas a brainless Cruise starrer 'Misson Impossible' gets a $100 million in just two days. Sad to see most comments on this thread. No one here cared to say anything about the unconventional ending - perhaps the makers should have played safe by making it more conventional -not trying to break ground rules and if they had to, they should have resorted to the usual shock therapy - a weapon so effectively used by Milan Luthria ('The Dity Picture') and Madhur Bhandarkar ('Page 3'). The Hindi film industry may be the most profitable one in the world but in terms of maturity, it is probably even behind the Iranian and Pakistani industri
Re: live example of how powerful prod houses can buy reviewers
by Anwar Ali on Feb 12, 2012 12:46 AM
Totally agree with that. But these reviewers know that there are still lots of fools who rush to theatres after beliving these reviewers. Todays reviewers have 0(zero) knowledge about films.
Re: Re: live example of how powerful prod houses can buy reviewer
by P R on Feb 12, 2012 08:16 AM
True.....99% Bollywood movies nowadays are BAKWAAAS...total waste of time and money.
Re: flop
by Hemant Sharma on Feb 12, 2012 07:42 PM
he is not khan , he just add khan to his name , go and check out his father name. then only u will understand.