Execllent choice..earlier he played the villain in the art house film 1947 earth...what a performance it was... then Fanna he played the lover with grey dhades.. n now an outright villain in a full commercial action..oh! man its like Ed Norton playing the villain in Italian Job...how excited im for the film now :)
Some people are right as far as now a days movies are concerned (they are having only screen presence). Best example is SRK don, only screen presence - no substance. And dhoom2 lost its sleek version of the Original with dances of hrithik, John abraham has given dhoom 1 a sleek look with his raw intensity of a villian which is lacking in dhoom 2
John has really given a great starter for a real franchisee like dhoom.
So certainly as Aamir is different, somewhat good can be expected than our screen gods SRK and hrithik, dances are unnecessary in a lethal movie like dhoom
Screen god worshippers better stay away atleast from fast paced movies like dhoom and dont spoil with rahul and aryan mixup
Re: dhoom3
by vadlamudi srinivas on Feb 02, 2011 03:55 PM
You are right as far as now a days movies are concerned (they are having only screen presence. Best example is SRK don, only screen presence - no substance. And dhoom2 is really a flop with dances of hrithik, John abraham has given dhoom 1 a sleek look with his raw intensity of a villian which is lacking in dhoom 2
So certainly as Aamir is different, somewhat good can be expected than our screen god SRK and dances are unnecessary in a lethal movie like dhoom original
Re: Re: Re: dhoom3
by vadlamudi srinivas on Feb 02, 2011 07:41 PM
you got me wrong, screen presence became synonymous with guys like srk and no no substance, but Aamir brings altogether a different charisma to the role.
I was answering to somebody who said Aamir does not have screen presence like srk or hrithik
