the womed who danced with sharukh khan are all majors and danced with the complete consent and consiousness,... so they are also liable for penalising undere obscenity at public place..why the man who resitered teh case left the women..??? why the police had not included the women's name also in the case..women always get the soft handling by the men o flaw and justice...they are also equal offenders in this act.
if a case to be registered ..the women are also party to such an indecent dance.. why is a case not been registered against the women who danced also..??
A case registered under the indecency act about a song in ra.one AFTER several months of its release ? and that too so close to the release of his next film DON 2? Me thinks something stinks in denmark. Part of SRK's publicity campaign.
Re: DON 2 publicity
by rajesh menon on Dec 21, 2011 05:25 PM
the case is not against the son in the movie..the case is for the dance he performed at the inauguration of Emmanuel Silks on Dec 4th at Cochin
