How's one to take a professional reviewer seriously when he writes "when Suresh Menon DOES something gibberish" & "Sanjay Dutt's ANTIQUES make you believe him to be a B-grade duplicate" (emphases mine). Nincompoops reviewing nincompoops?
Re: Chatur Singh
by Kiruppa Kalyanraman on Aug 19, 2011 07:50 PM
This is not the first time a reviewer has used antiques instead of antics. I guess they don't know the difference between both. They may be homophones but have a totally different meaning.
I usually don't read reviews much less respond. But this one made me laugh out loud especially, the bald guy pulling his hair. The fact of the matter is bollywood churns out these sad excuses in the name of art, only a handful worth watching in a decade. Every bollywood film needs to be ripped apart in reviews. We love to support and praise mediocrity in this country
After reading this piece, I am sure quality of English has deteriorated since India became home to largest population to speak the language. "Antiques" and "Antics" are the same Mr Reviewer. Once a piece is written, please read it yourself before putting it out. If you can stand it, then you can be sure that people like you will like it. But I sincerely hope that you are one-of-a-kind ANTIQUE
Re: The reviewer needs to go back to school
by Inayat Jehangir on Aug 19, 2011 12:47 PM
After reading this piece, I am sure quality of English has deteriorated since India became home to largest population to speak the language. "Antiques" and "Antics" are the same Mr Reviewer? Once a piece is written, please read it yourself before putting it out. If you can stand it, then you can be sure that people like you will like it. But I sincerely hope that you are one-of-a-kind ANTIQUE
This guy obviously knows nothing about movies. I caught the movie today and must say its a masterpiece. It has multi-layered characters and a powerful script. Writer had done a wonderful job with the dialogues which are witty, quirky and full of dark humor. This is a movie which respects audience's intelligence. Ajay Chandok (Director) is a real discovery and it is safe to say he is a Woody Allen in making. It is nice to see that producers are investing money in movies like this which break rules and redefine film-making. The character "Chatur Singh" will remain with you long after you have left the hall. We need to appreciate bold cinema like this. Book your tickets today, coz there is a "Chatur Singh" in all of us.
Re: This reviewer knows nothing about cinema.
by Saugata Bhattacharya on Aug 19, 2011 01:16 PM
Dear Akhilesh -either u r a total dumbo when it comes to movies or u r paid by Sanjay Dutt to post a positive review about the movie. People were leaving the movie hall even before Interval was called. This is not a movie but a disaster.
Re: Re: Re: This reviewer knows nothing about cinema.
by prabhajit sarkar on Aug 19, 2011 03:19 PM
thats what you call "sarchasm": The abyss between the creator of witticisms and the intended recipient who does not find the humor in it
This guy obviously knows nothing about movies. I caught the movie today and must say its a masterpiece. It has multi-layered characters and a powerful script. Writer had done a wonderful job with the dialogues which are witty, quirky and full of dark humor. This is a movie which respects audience's intelligence. Ajay Chandok (Director) is a real discovery and it is safe to say he is a Woody Allen in making. It is nice to see that producers are investing money in movies like this which break rules and redefine film-making. The character "Chatur Singh" will remain with you long after you have left the hall. We need to appreciate bold cinema like this. Book your tickets today, coz there is a "Chatur Singh" in all of us.
If the movie is so atrociously bad, why the critic wasted his precious time ,vocabulary. The movie could have been thrashed into pieces in a para only.
