just have a careful look at d photo two hands are holding the baby,2nd hand belongs 2 third person,its not hers,because both hand are in d same direction,bad photography,cant hold her own baby
Re: look
by kaushik on Oct 28, 2010 08:45 PM
It's her hands. She has really big palms, so it looks like somebody's hands in the opposite direction. The palm under the hand is hers.
Re: look
by rakesh k on Oct 29, 2010 08:46 AM
hi buddy, Its just her two long lean hands with big palms.The slight limp does hide her mid right arm under the shadows of the baby's lower bottom.Thats it.If the baby would be just few inches lower down,you wouldn't have noticed her hands at all.
Re: look
by PoliticallyIncorrect on Oct 28, 2010 07:59 PM
keen observation dude, but the other hand is also hers.. it is not the same way, it is coming from the other way..from the baby's bottoms, the back of her palm is starting towards right...
Re: Re: look
by sacchi baat on Oct 28, 2010 08:06 PM
no sir both hands are in same direction,see wrists are pointed in same directions ,wrists are thiner than elbow portion,its two hand,and other one is slightly darker,it cud be some one holding her from back and given support of his left hand
Re: look
by Kaka on Oct 28, 2010 10:03 PM
Lad, u are a genius with a perfect pair of eyes. Why dont u take up spot fixing as a profession? U can earn lotsa maal if u detect more such juicy details.
Re: Neatly shown
by Santa on Oct 28, 2010 04:20 PM
The best way to capture that bond is a cow feeding her calf. No need of a woman shedding her clothes to show that. This is just for money and nothing else.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Neatly shown
by adam simon on Oct 28, 2010 10:46 PM
But thats her job does. No one has asked you to shed cloths.
What wrong in nuidty if done artistically. There is difference between pornography and artistic nudity. This is no way an pornographic picture. Its very sweet and beautiful.
