Discussion Board

''Come what may, won''t allow Bigg Boss''


Total 352 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
ProudtobeanINDIAN citizen
L.K.ADVANI
by ProudtobeanINDIAN citizen on Oct 05, 2010 10:43 PM  | Hide replies

L.K.ADVANI IS also from pakistan, but shiv sena has close links with advani and his party, becoz of pakistanis based terroists we hate them and we should hate terrorists, but dont forget they r also a part in the independence struggle.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
overblown blown
Re: L.K.ADVANI
by overblown blown on Oct 06, 2010 09:20 AM
you cutlu, that time it was not pakistan, it was india. go and take a flying fkuc.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ProudtobeanINDIAN citizen
shilpa shetty won big boss in london
by ProudtobeanINDIAN citizen on Oct 05, 2010 10:38 PM  | Hide replies

when shilpa shetty can participate and won the big boss of london based , every one appreciated then whats wrong if other nationals are participating in indian version big boss.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Kaka
Re: shilpa shetty won big boss in london
by Kaka on Oct 05, 2010 10:59 PM
Here in there is a differance, she went to UK with whom India has close ties where as we dont have with Pakistan. And u should be aware why?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ProudtobeanINDIAN citizen
Re: Re: shilpa shetty won big boss in london
by ProudtobeanINDIAN citizen on Oct 05, 2010 11:09 PM
this is just a show for celebraties,yes we have bad relations with them, uk is worst than pakistan u knew why?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kaka
Re: Re: Re: shilpa shetty won big boss in london
by Kaka on Oct 05, 2010 11:14 PM
Why should it be worse? Did they send whit Brit terrorists to kill our people or indulged in bomb attacks on Indian soil? No comparisons here, UK is anyday a million times better than Porkis.

All these Porkis come to India and earn lots of good money. Many come to Bollywood like Adnan Sami, Salma Agha, etc and call themselves as Indians, talking of India as their nation. They know that they cannot rake in money in Pak like they can in India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
viven rodriguse
thakre
by viven rodriguse on Oct 05, 2010 10:20 PM  | Hide replies

thankre u r joker man...v had seen ur drama wen MINK was releasing....do something new man...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sunit Kumar
Re: thakre
by Sunit Kumar on Oct 06, 2010 04:45 AM
Colours the channel is owned by Rahul Mahajan, do u have brains ? dont fall trap to politicians !!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Shaik Jilani
Who
by Shaik Jilani on Oct 05, 2010 09:10 PM

is watching it anyway? Is it some kind of publicity gimmick??

    Forward  |  Report abuse
krishnanand singh
Unilateral relationship
by krishnanand singh on Oct 05, 2010 08:26 PM  | Hide replies

Feelings of love and better relationship can never be Unilateral. We have tried alot to mend our relationships with Pakistan even at the cost of our dignity at in international arena. I However feel this kind illogical and irrelevant initiative would never help to mend relationsships.

As far as participation of Pakistanis in reality show is concerned then everybody is aware that some cheap news channels & T V channels they want to take their popularity beyond boundries in GULF at the cost of countries dignity. Further, money from GULF which they receive directly or indirectly also influences their behaviour. Government must look and taken action on it.

Further, I never understood how can a pakistani compete in India based on voting till finals of relaity show in INDIA. These channels make a fool of Us. And we all donot sense it.

In additions to this many Indian to show off their braod mindedness they support Pakistani participation for Reality show. I think neither we Indians have not learnt any lessons from the last hindu King Prithiviraj Chauhan nor the Indain Government.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
anand zawar
Re: Unilateral relationship
by anand zawar on Oct 05, 2010 10:26 PM
very well said....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mandar Pawar
Re: Unilateral relationship
by Mandar Pawar on Oct 05, 2010 08:32 PM
Verry well said.....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mandar Pawar
Re: Re: Unilateral relationship
by Mandar Pawar on Oct 05, 2010 08:54 PM
Please note, Prithiviraj Chauhan was not the last Hindu King.

Marathas formed the last largest Hindu Empire; Shivaji laid the footstep in 16th century which was taken to its peak by Peshwas.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Marathi Indian
Re: Unilateral relationship
by Marathi Indian on Oct 05, 2010 08:30 PM
Good One. I hope all understand this instead of abusing each other.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Chohan
Re: Re: Unilateral relationship
by Chohan on Oct 05, 2010 10:43 PM
Seems like India has decided already and visas were handed already. while the rest can beat their chest and watch the show.
Do not worry color tv will play bandai mataram in the end after humiliating pakistanis in the house. You see money earned along with votes and patriotism tag is a game.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
S Narain
I agree with SS for a change ...Boycott it !!!!!!!!
by S Narain on Oct 05, 2010 08:21 PM  | Hide replies



The following mail I endorse

what about other criminals in bigboss
by edtorrdffmail (View MyPage) on Oct 05, 2010 08:07 PM

abbas kazmi has been defending shitty terrorists,

seema parihar is a known dacoit,

rahul bhatt was seriously linked with headley (terrorist) and

the anchor salman khan has two court cases against him - black bucks and killing under influence...(of course salman is friendly with thackerays)

I reckon Salman as good hearted guy as compared to Paki sympathiser SRK and may be pardoned by Indian public

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Marathi Indian
Re: I agree with SS for a change ...Boycott it !!!!!!!!
by Marathi Indian on Oct 05, 2010 08:24 PM
Yes. true. I watched almost all shows in Previous Big Boss. But now I will not watch.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Onie
Re: I agree with SS for a change ...Boycott it !!!!!!!!
by Onie on Oct 05, 2010 09:26 PM
Hold on a second. The right to legal representation is a constitutional right - if you are accused of a crime, you are entitled to legal defence even if you cannot pay for it on your own. This is what differentiates the Indian legal system from kangaroo courts in places like China or Myanmar.

I cannot see how we can attach any blame to Abbas Kazmi, not least because he was directed to defend Kasab by the court.

Similarly Rahul Bhatt's association with Headley has been - to the best of my knowledge - been described as incidental. I have not come across any media coverage to suggest it was sinister.

I agree with your comment about the other participants. I do not see why a dacoit or a thief should be given a platform. They should be treated as social outcasts.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 352 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message