This KITE is not meant for flying as there is no story, no soul in the film and it completely fails to connect with audience. Bad luck Hritik better luck next time after 2-3 years.
i believe that there was problem in advertisement too, if you see any propmotion, it does not give you any impression. plus too much hype also kills sometime. Hritk is very good actor no dount about it, but still he lacks something what other posses like, selecting the script, selecting the heroin etc.and ofcourse the LUCK and Banner, he is having not having special luck which is having to Khans.
Guys belive me is not so bad The plus point of film is 1. Hritik - Wht a look he posses man|| 2. Editing of the film 3. Location & picturisition Negative of the film 1. Too much spanish & subtitile in Hindi, at least the subtitile must be in English for Non-Hindi speaking state 2. Poor ending - The last seen underwater is not required at all
Re: Kites not so bad
by Devin Aaron on May 25, 2010 06:12 AM
Hey man the pro's u listed is as the same as the con's of the movie. Out of 3 points u mentioned, wht does a person's looks and location/picturization got to do w.telling a story in 1,2,or 3 hours.
Its better for the movie to reduce it to 30 minutes nd showd on the travel channel.
The con's u mentioned contradicts ur statement of "Kites not so bad". Ar u bein sarcastic?
its certainly better than some recent nonsense like housefull and badmaash company but it falls well below expectations. hrithik should choose better scripts. the only films with goos scripts he's done so far are lakshya and jodha akbar. hope guzarish will be better :)
Re: Very average
by First Last on May 22, 2010 09:26 AM
You are very average or below average. Your poor English is funny. You seem to be deliberately inserted on the planet earth.
