Re: wat dddd ffff .............
by Amit Mehta on May 07, 2010 06:07 PM
Hes trying to show everyone that he has an American Accent. He probably forgot Indians have British Accent not American Accent.
Re: wat dddd ffff .............
by Ashish Shete on May 07, 2010 05:39 PM
Raja Sen, You are such an idiot, why you feel the need of using such a heavy vocab.. come out of the slavery man, be Indian use Indian English.
Re: Re: wat dddd ffff .............
by Joideep on May 07, 2010 08:09 PM
All you people, complaining about his vocabulary really need to improve your own. There is nothing "high/heavy vocab" in this review. I have not seen the movie as yet, but from the trailers it seems it wont be as good as the first one, there seem to be too many plot lines and it trying a little too hard to be witty.
Robert Downey Jr is so good, he makes Johnny Depp, Will Smith and others look crass.
The movie might not be as good as the first installment, but just his presence makes it worthwhile to watch the movie. If you want to see how a bad movie can be salvaged by a good actor then go and watch Sherlock Holmes.
Re: Best actor in present times
by Rani on May 07, 2010 05:55 PM
I agree with you twice here..
RDJ is much ahead of JD,WS and others.....and Sherlock holmes was as crappy as it could get but for RDJ...he just carried the entire movie on his forceps....literally...
Re: Re: Best actor in present times
by Deepak on May 07, 2010 06:04 PM
But was Sherlock Holmes that bad, ofcourse RDJ carried the movie, but i tot it was decent
Re: Re: Re: Best actor in present times
by Ambalavanan parthasarathy on May 08, 2010 12:38 AM
sherlock holmes wasnt that bad...guy ritchie has excactly prtrayed yhe entire characters of arthur conan doyles holmes thru RDJ...commendable performance....kindly know about the original sherlock before commenting on the movie....
Re: Somebody tell me HOW IS THIS MOVIE??
by NIKHIL NATHAN on May 07, 2010 04:28 PM
It's a no good Movie.I really liked the frst one and went to the second with huge expectations but unfortunately it turned out to be boring.Iron Man franchisee has hit a low with this version.Hugely Dissapointing.I would love to go to the First one if it's again launched in the theatres but this one.........
I find the above review crap. It looks like Raja has not seen the movie. Its not a patch compared to iron man. Much of the stuff involves lots of banter. Its only worth watching for a 3 minute action sequence between Rourke and Downey in mid part of the movie. Mickey is terrific but is hardly given any screen time. Scarlett pouts does matrix action stunts at end and Gywneth simmers and show her long legs providing eye candy to viewers. Go and watch it only for the three minute action sequence and you would not miss anything by walking out after that
Hi There...I want to request u that kindly use english that is understood by everyone.. reviewer writes such tough words beyond understand that people like us cannot make out if movie is worth a watch..pls make a note of it to use simple english...thanx
Re: Pls use simple English
by ILoveMy India on May 07, 2010 04:51 PM
Watch the stars and decide to go or not go for it... or want to save money by reading the story..
It has been noticed that every critic and movie follower use to give so many good remarks to holly flicks.its a trend for now a days being an indian we use to feed shame to quot any hindi movie as our fevorite infront of our friends ao society......guys stop thinking like that its our film indutry and we shud love it as today indian films are being accepted by the globe.............
Re: praising hollywood
by Jay D on May 07, 2010 04:35 PM
Hollywood has its share of both crappy and good movies. But even their crappy movies stands apart from Bollywood's good ones! Bollywood sucks! Bollywood is all about recycling same old stories, or copying from Hollywood and brainless comedies!
