i will givethe link tomorrow and you all can see what dilip kumar said and then accept that srk is better.doing a good sript movie does not come in good acting .aamir is not at all known outside india.my name is khan tickets in germany(berlin) was of 1000 euroes(60000 indian rupees)and no one is mad to pay that huge amount for a movie.south ghajini starring suriya of tamil was much better than aamir and even murugudass(director of ghajini) said .just watch that ghajini and compare.aamir has won only 2 best actor filmfare awards and shahrukh has won 7 and dilip kumar leading with 8 .shahrukh has won 14 filmfare awards in different categories and aamir only 6.srk has won more than 70 awards in all types of different functions ,but still public want to say that aamir is better and the judges are fool, critics are fool.DDLJ is still in one of the theatres in mumbai.it is 15 years now and still in theatre and when it completed 10 years it was houseful on that day.giving a hit by having good script and multiple stars is not excellence, srk gives hits by having normal scripts and ALONE.srk has won best villain award for DARR.aamir cant even think of that thats why he refused DARR bcz he said that he was very kiddish looking and it will not suit him.so please keeping aside all the points like different movie, meaningful movie, different look etc(it does not comes in acting) tell me the points where aamir is good.
Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by Kempt Killer on Feb 17, 2010 01:39 AM
Good to see the helpless SRK fan putting his all efforts on writing a speech against Aamir and his movie 3I, Whereas the article is about review of MNIK
here come the loopholes of 3 idiots.if madhavan was not interested in engineering then how did he get 97% in 10th ,94% in 12th and how did he got selected in top IIT college when 4 lakhs students were dumped as boman irani said .IIT is not a game that anyone who is not interested can just enter into it.aamir said that a person cant succeed if not interested so did madhavan get into IIT.aamir is so fool in the movie that he suggested madhavan to leave IIT when he was in the last semester.only 6 months were left for the completion he could have completed the graduation and then also he could go to photography.no one can practically do that.i wanted to be a pilot when i was young but now i am not .every person loves something else other than studies so they should leave the studies .just think what will happen if ever1 do what there heart says.one of my friend is interested in girls so accroding to aamir he should go and RAPE girls.the tag line "DONT GO BEHIND SUCCESS, GO FOR EXCELLENCE AND YOU WILL ULTIMATELY REACH SUCCESS" But the public didnt see that the last word in the above senetnce says SUCCESS AND THAT MEANS HE STILL WANTS TO SUCCEED , EXCELLENCE IS ONLY THE LADDER .this means that he is behind success.it would have been correct if he says that dont run behind success , run behind excellence, he should no have said last part.so wake up all of you or i should give some proofs of videos that how many takes aamir takes and how much editing he do in the movie
Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by Kempt Killer on Feb 17, 2010 01:40 AM
Good to see the helpless SRK fan putting his all efforts on writing a speech against Aamir and his movie 3I, Whereas the article is about review of MNIK
Re: Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by mohd shoeb on Feb 17, 2010 02:03 AM
where are u gone.come lets fight over the discussion .scareddddddddddddd.3 1 IDIOTS
Re: Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by mohd shoeb on Feb 17, 2010 01:45 AM
3 idiots was rejected by shahrukh and ranbir bcz it was only for idiots like aamir and you.if u dont know about this news , i can help u by sending the link.
Re: Re: Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by mohd shoeb on Feb 17, 2010 01:48 AM
still much was left to send against aamir but server is slow.good for aamir fans.
Re: Re: Re: Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by ishita on Feb 17, 2010 03:23 AM
u r super idiot, 1st thing Madhvan got 97% n 94% marks yes why not...as that time he was studied under his father, he was at home not ih hostel ..n off course its matter a lot. 2nd thing AAmir asked to madhavn leave IIT only when madhvan called for job abroad from a very professional photograph. 3 rd thing dont go behind sucesses its not mean success is not imp for him its mean dont run behind succsees ,just let success come to you. be made yorself like this that success automatically come to u. n plz dont show ur super stupidy in comparing desire/flesh with liking/ interest.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by mohd shoeb on Feb 17, 2010 08:42 AM
hi everyone .i am writing for the first time in any site like this, and this is bcz there is a lot of misunderstanding in all of you.i want to clear it today.if u all think practically then please accept the truth. first of all SRK started his career as a stage performer like naseeruddin shah and no one can compare any person who are theatre actors as there are no retake on the stage.even amitabh bachchan said that he can't act like naseeruddin shah in one of the interviews.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by mohd shoeb on Feb 17, 2010 08:43 AM
has any1 ever tried to know that what is going behind the scenes in bollywood.mahesh bhatt the best critic and a powerful social speaker in bollywood said that if SRK is said aas the king of bollywood so it really means that bcz king title is given by the bollywood and not by SRK or any public, and if aamir says that he is the ace OF BOLLYWOOD THEN HE HIMSELF IS SAYING THT he is good or better not the bollywood.Here comes the bitter truth aamir is an actor who takes 20-50 takes for a single shot and we see the movie which is having the best scene out of those 50 shots/takes but mahesh bhatt said that SRK never takes more than 5 takes for a shot and many a times he hits at thye first.he added that srk GIVES WHAT the director wants and aamir gives what he can give soo there is a lot of difference in this.for example if in a dance the master says that u should stretch your legs to 180 degrees and the person cant do that but he do something else instead of that, but the public liked it then its aamir and shahrukh is a person who do what the director wants and that s the reason aamir is said to interfere in the work of directors and makers.if he is perfect he will never do that.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by mohd shoeb on Feb 17, 2010 08:44 AM
most of them say that he is a perfectionist so i wd like to say that everyone should know the meaning of perfection then.if he is perfect then he will give a shot without any take and can repeat the same ACT for hundreds of time, this will be perfection.and by the way growing hair and beard like in mangal pandey , building muscles like in ghajini and making different and meaningful movies does not mean that he is good in acting.i can also grow hair and beard like mangal pandey and i already have better muscles than ghajini but i will not say that i am a good actor .good selection ,good script and meaningful movies are always a symbol of aamir khan but can any1 tell me that good selection comes in acting, it is only judgement and should say that he is clever. i will select a good script so i will become a good actor, is that you all think.acting is performing not selecting .
If aamir have power so ask him to make DEVDAS AND DON of those legendy actors like DILIP KUMAR AND AMITABH BACHCHAN, you all dont know how much risk is there to remake anything of such legendry actors as there is always a fear of comparison, non acceptance etc but shahrukh did and was successful. LIST OF GOOD ACOTRS DILIP KUMAR AND SHAHRUKH KHAN AAMIR KHAN AJAY DEVGAN Naseeruddin shah paresh rawal anupam kher nana patekar
Re: shahrukh is much better than aamir
by Kempt Killer on Feb 17, 2010 01:40 AM
Good to see the helpless SRK fan putting his all efforts on writing a speech against Aamir and his movie 3I, Whereas the article is about review of MNIK
