Sohail Tanvir in a recent interview by a Tv channel in Pakistan has clearly blamed hindus in India for the non inclusion of Pakistan players in IPL . And the hosts of the TV channel also agree with him . Do we need such players who carry hatred towards India. And regarding Mashrafe Mortaza, was he really paid USD 600,000/- Itis rumoured that he was only paid USD 100000 and the balance has gone to SRK account in London through hawala. Any sensible person with very very little cricketing knowledge will not pay such huge amount to player like
Mashrafe Mortaza. Interview by Sohail Tanvir can be watched on youtube
SRK always uses his religion to gain popularity , why always he is bothered for pakistanis, he never talk about australians who are told not to come to india. KKR is full of pakistani players and even then he wants a pakistan coach ie. wasim akram. is there anything he did for India to prove that he is Indian, always worry for pakistanis , he shud go to pak and when they will throw him out in the garbage then he will understood. he is playing with the emotion of Indian people. bloody idiot chap
Re: Is SRK hand in gloves with Shiv Sena to promote his movie?
by Wepoorindians on Feb 07, 2010 12:33 PM
No doubt about it.
Do you know what Shiv Sena Supremo said yesterday ?
Sena is not asking people to boycott SRK's new movie i.e MY NAME IS KHAN.
This itself exposes their real intention. Fools only think that Shiv Sena or Bajrang Dal is a Hindu fundamentalist in actual they are playing Hindu card to remain in power. There is nothing like anti-Muslim wave and it is all for politics. These parties are very close friend of all rich people irrespective of their caste, creed or religion.
I really don;t understand SRK;s problem. Why he is creating the issues only at the time of his movie release? Looks like he learned this trick from tamil idiots only. These tamil idiots are more notorious for using these types of actvities at the time of their movie release. SRK will quiet for sometime and he will start a new issue when his next film is due
... adopt 2 language formula - local language Marathi and English. Ditch Hindi altogether from the education system, government, legal, official purposes.
Hindi is NOT national language. It is a regional language of UP Biharis. They have no right to use this regional language on other regions of the country where they mass-migrate.
Kong is a regional party masquerading as national party. Is dynasty since the last 60 years have represented UP LS seats. Their heart beats for UP BIharis and Hindi language despite Hindi not being national language.
Breaking up of linguistic states into small states will further weaken non-Hindi languages, regional parties and thus more power to Centre.
Look at Mumbai. As soon as mass-migration has changed demographics towards UP Biharis, they are planning to split Maharashtra too. Already top kongi leaders from Mumbai are UP Biharis and top kongi leaders from other parts of Maharashtra are salivating over Vidarbha and some for an opportunity to carry chappals of klown prince.
Re: DOGS OF DAWOOD IBRAHIM!
by Indian Marathi on Feb 07, 2010 09:55 AM
THEY ARE MAKING THE PEOPLE OF MAHARASHTRA FOOLS BY ISSUING ANTI-MUSLIM STATEMENTS ----
Dawwod and his chamachs got the picture on 1993 , your certifiacte not required ...
Re: DOGS OF DAWOOD IBRAHIM!
by againstpseudos on Feb 07, 2010 09:57 AM
All non- Marathi brethren... Pls stop teaching Marathis. We never supported those goons. But now seeing the attitude of media and other folks to paint Marathi as anti-national, it makes sense to be on the side of SS / MNS.
The Klown-Khan is trying to backpedal so fast and furiously on his earlier foolish statement, that we are scared he may even fall off his bike !
His words were : "Pakistan is a good enighbour. My father was born in Pakistan".
How can these words possibly be misconstrued ?
So, is he trying to say that when he made his earlier statement, what he actually meant was : " Pakistan is a bad, evil neighbour. My father was not born in Pakistan".
If this is what he had meant to say, then he does have a strange way of choosing his words !!
Re: Klown Khan : Backpedalling fast and furiously
by Diya Sengupta on Feb 07, 2010 11:02 AM
The miscontructing is like this: He spoke out in favour of Pakistani cricketers---> so he doesn't appreciate the seriousness of 26/11, doesn't care about people who died= in short doesn't really love his country, (and many have also suggested, is a traitor who loves Pakistan).
If you go back along that equation there is no direct causalty. Basically, he said "Pakistan is a good neighbour. My father was born in Pakistan" and that has been read as "I love Pakistan, my father was Pakistani, I am for Pakistan, and don't love India"
Of course, you've already made up your mind about him so you won't really care that he may be correct.
Re: Re: Klown Khan : Backpedalling fast and furiously
by snimra on Feb 07, 2010 03:44 PM
Why only cricketers I say ban all the trade with Pakistan- jute, salt, sugar, cotton, poultry etc Can you?? During last 10 years mnay indians killed, molested scores of Americans and Canadians, over 10,000 indians were busted on fake degrees frauds and visas. Should we start a protest and kick all indians out of USA and canada??
Rahul planned mumbai trip 2 months back. There was plan about what to talk before visit so that Sena can hit back, and so by their reply rahul will get maximun TRP in up/bihar. --- So, If Rahul and Co. want to burn maharashtra to win UP/Bihar election then what is difference between him and raj ???
Re: difference ?
by againstpseudos on Feb 07, 2010 09:59 AM
There is a difference. Rahul has more bigger plans - to break the country. SS and MNS activities are chillar in front of his plans
