Watch it on YOU TUBE, this is first hindi movie had a world premire on you tube, i have watched it y'day, nice 1 time entertainer. Sid is great and flawless actor, Aditya Pancholi was also good.
I enjoyed the movie. I liked the way they showed the late 80s and early 90s hairstyles and clothing..especially those loose printed shirts of the 90s. Bollywood is going good with these narrative flashback movies..
What a brilliant performance by Siddharth. Definitely the only actor of present generation who could give Ranbir Kapoor a close fight. We have more young actors such as Abhay Deol,Shahid Kapoor, Neil Nitin Mukesh, Imran Khan but only Siddharth seems to be in the league of Ranbir's effortless acting. Brilliant acting, waiting for more good stuff from Siddharth.
Sukanya, you should explain to the viewers that why you had given striker 3 stars and Rann 2 Stars. You are so intelligent. Please share your secret of smart journalism. Really this is the heights of journalism.
Re: Biased Review , how come rating of RANN Is 2 and Striker is 3
by shivkumar menon on Feb 07, 2010 01:14 AM
Becos Rann has nothing new to offer and Striker is completely innovative and comes with a "STORY"
Trust that's enough premise to differentiate between the two movies.
this movie is really good ,director chandan arora has made all this films following a particular character but this one is best ,also knowing the intelligence levels of majority of indian audience(where johnny gadar was a flop),i am sure it will flop,sad that chandan arora is not yet a big name ,with lil more backing and funds ,he can create wonders ,his kind of directors are inspiration for aspiring directors
