Re: Photographer
by RKD on Aug 11, 2010 06:30 PM
Rajadhyaksha is respected man in Marathi culture.... You may restrain your words at least for the old people like Mr.Rajadhyaksha... 2moro you may say to your own parents also the same words what you have uttered for Mr.Rajadhyaksha.
Aiswarya beautiful??? If yes, 90% of all goris in the West would be termed beautiful. Of course with so many Gori's falling in the category they can only be termed as ordinary. Horrific is a better word for this mindless booty
Re: Mindless not timeless
by bipin gaur on Aug 11, 2010 05:39 PM
Wow, so there ARE people who would crticize anything and everything. They just seem to occur more frequently in India. If she were considered beautiful then how come even westerners consider her beautiful. Apply your brains.
Re: Mindless not timeless
by Rajeev Aggarwal on Aug 11, 2010 07:24 PM
Though I see where you are coming from, it does not make Aishwarya less beautiful. I think what you are trying to say is that we Indians equate fair skin and balanced features as beauty which is a norm among all caucasian women. I am not saying it after reading any book or newspaper. It is out of personal exposure for last 20 years. Aishwarya is accepted as beauty in west, not simply for her looks (because she does indeed look like majority of ordinary girls in west), it is because of her bollywood popularity and her supposed intelligence and her Indian background. You do not find her in much commercials/adverts in west because her looks are nothing new for these people. Compared to that Freida Pinto is considered equally beautiful in west whereas in India we would not even want to give her any movie since Slumdog Millionaire. Om Puri is considered handsome in west. It is all because in west the beauty is not skin deep and internal strength of character is the measure of beauty. Unfortunately, in India, fair skin and symmetric face itself can make you the timeless beauty.
