GOOD DECISION BIPS ! WHO NEEDS MARRIAGE IN THESE DAYS WHEN 90% CELEBRITY MARRIAGES FAIL ANYWAY.
AND NOW EVEN INDIAN GOVERNMENT HAS LEGALISED 'LIVING-IN' RELATIONSHIPS WHICH ARE BETTER AS LONG AS THERE ARE NO KIDS INVOLVED. DON'T BRING MORE KIDS INTO THIS ALREADY OVERPOPULATED WORLD.
Bips is right. Y she should marry john as everything she is getting from him without maarying him and she dont need kid as yet. Everything means everything.
These people are sin for India, as they behave like animals (except rogue), which do not have the 6th sense.
Being celebrities, they spoil the easily provocable young generation today, who have the interest to test, what these people do.
Very unfortunate that few parents too proud of their children that they live in modern world. FInally what remain is sleepless nights by the couple due to their ego and suspicion about the other
Re: Re: Another way of pros!!!
by johnny robert on Apr 22, 2010 02:39 PM
I am johnny from chennai. I am looking for a good friend like you. If you are in-truest in getting a good friend accept me as yours friend.
Re: Re: Another way of pros!!!
by johnny robert on Apr 22, 2010 02:42 PM
I am johnny from chennai. I am looking for a good friend like you. If you are in-truest in getting a good friend accept me as yours friend.
They both can do all the things of a couple without getting married except making children. Marriage is just a certificate in India to make children. In other counties no need of this certificate to make children . its optional.
Re: True . No need
by Sagar Muniram on Apr 06, 2010 02:29 PM
After living togethr for 8 years which is more than some peopls married life, what must have been left for marrage. Marriage is meaningless for such people and these people are blots on our society.
Re: Re: True . No need
by sumit mukherjee on Apr 06, 2010 03:58 PM
on one hand you state that they have lived together longer than some married ppl, on the other hand you state that they are a blot on the society...both can't be true.
Re: True . No need
by Devin Aaron on Apr 12, 2010 09:49 PM
Whts marriage nd certificate got in common? Isn't not the same as whn u wer born ur mom got u a birth certificate so tht u know ur identity instead or its obvious tht ur parents figured the hell w.making a big deal out of ur birth day. As long as ur born on any ordinary day, whts so special abt naming u nd all tht stuff.
Thse days pepul don't evn understand the word marriage. Thy ar following dumb Confucius nd his def. of marriage tht is union of 2 diff. "surnames" and hence "a certificate" only defines marriage.
The most simple def. of marriage is loving relationship/companinship, which obviously applies to "live in relationship" too. Also, marriage is simply being unified, now humans in general don't practice unity,compaionship w.any1 or love b.tween family,friends,co-workers,neighbors etc..Rather humans jst can't get along. Its useless of havin his/her relationship defined as unified,love, nd life long companionship(marriage), which is rare these days in human beings themselves to practice unity,love,companionship in general. Whtr live in, marriage or whtvr name u wnt to give ur relationship thrs no genuine love,unity/life long companionship.
If u don't "practice" those qualities not jst mouth them in greeting cards or a song, thn pepul ar cynical abt marriage nd luk sumwher else whr its much easier fr them to handle nd less time consuming.
GOOD DECISION BIPS ! WHO NEEDS MARRIAGE IN THESE DAYS WHEN 90% CELEBRITY MARRIAGES FAIL ANYWAY.
AND NOW EVEN INDIAN GOVERNMENT HAS LEGALISED 'LIVING-IN' RELATIONSHIPS WHICH ARE BETTER AS LONG AS THERE ARE NO KIDS INVOLVED. DON'T BRING MORE KIDS INTO THIS ALREADY OVERPOPULATED WORLD.
