Dunno if any other patriotic Indians saw musicals like Chicago or Moulin Rouge. One thing is that the actors sang themselves, which again is so easy...In Bollywood they lip sync..which requires real talent.
Reminds me of some idiot Indian comparing Mithun Chakraborty to Micheal Jackson. Mithun had talent. MJ was a singer, writer, composer and a great dancer...whereas in Bollywood you lip sync to someone singing to dumb lyrics set to a stolen tune..again shows Indian talent and why Bollywood in number 1.
Directors like Vipul Shah, are pure shrwed businessmen..make movie with idiotic lack-lusture emotions..a foreign angle..get money in pounds/$..make profit..go away..who cares abt script..
Only slave N. Indians can come up with such a title. London or UK is not a paradise. The illiterate director and so-called stars are praising a washed out country and city while the british are kicking Indians out. What a silly joke.
Re: London dreams
by FO on Oct 31, 2009 07:39 PM
you s. indians are slaves every where and make that placestink whereever you stand or sit. Not even UK but whole world has a bad impression about india only because of you.go take a bath, and dont forget to wash your a..then come here on rediff. I can smellsomething here also.
Re: Re: this is to
by FO on Oct 31, 2009 11:09 AM
Singh is Kingh was a blockbuster. If you didn't like it doesn't mean that nobody likes it. Learn to respect other's choice.
Re: this is to
by FO on Oct 31, 2009 11:14 AM
I am not sure about this movie but Kannada was definitely a copy of a hollywood movie. Why do you always miss that part ?
Re: this is to
by Swati on Oct 30, 2009 10:00 PM
No. It is a copy of some oscar winner american film. Hollywood is a good source of all hindi, kannadda, tamil etc films.
