There should be Law for not to change the History. If they keep changing name like Madras to Chennai/Calcutta to Kolkotta/Bombay to Mumbai etc etc. Mumbai name was already existed from long time & its a regeional name put by original residents. Bombay or Bambbai is the comfortable pronounsation for English people or non-Maharashtrians. There should be universal law in all over India that nothing should be change which gives birth to contraversis. Even Govt. should not alllow people to build statues. To put flags of different colors which causes riots. They should not allow people dig the roads for putting different party boards etc etc. Regionalism/Castism/Language egoism/Politicians & opprtunitism are the biggest enemies of India. So come together & save India.
raj thakeray says he likes speeking only in marathi.now if he goes to any other state and wants to hire a taxi.does he still speek only in marathi or takes an interpreter along.
Re: only in marathi
by howudoudo on Oct 03, 2009 05:20 PM
he clearly says when migrants (including Marathis) whichever states they go to settle must speak in the language of the state where they have migrated to. assimilation is the message.
Re: Re: only in marathi
by Bolo India on Oct 04, 2009 06:37 PM
hope you speak to your boss in marathi and not english? Why doesn't Raj target large expats speaking in english??
Re: Re: only in marathi
by Bolo India on Oct 04, 2009 06:36 PM
assimilation cannot be forced unless it is made a law...if that be the case Raj Thackrey should address in hindi when speaking to hindi news channel for the sake of assimilation...or is he too ashamed of speaking in official language of the INDIA (in bold)????
Its a pity that in a country where 300 million people are BPL. We are spending our time and blood in discussing why mumbai is called bombay in a movie. Give me a break we should set our priorities first. But this wouldnt change people of india are jokers. British made fool of us for 200 years and Politicians for next 62 years. WAKE UP PEOPLE OF INDIA
Re: Its a pity
by aditya bhat on Oct 03, 2009 03:34 PM
Since u r not from mumbai u dont understand the seriousness of the issue! Afterall outsiders will be outsiders!
Re: Re: Its a pity
by Vishal Sharma on Oct 05, 2009 03:04 PM
I am a proper mumbaikar staying in Mumbai from last 27 years...pls explain as to by referring Mumbai as Bombay how will things improve in BOMBAY? Instead People like RT or any other politician should raise how to improve the infrastructure in Mumbai...they should agitate in providing compulsory education be it providing free education to those who cannot afford...This way automatically everything will improve. But presently the politicians including RT is just filling their pockets.
Re: Re: Its a pity
by kailash dewangan on Oct 03, 2009 03:42 PM
u are talking as if u are illiterate. explain me what is serious in this. and u have sick mentality. we all are indians and nothing else. no indian is outsider to me. if u have attitude like people of other states are stealing jobs of marathis then i must say that marathi peoples are also getting job in other cities. and if marathi people are not able to get the job in other state then its person specific problem. man grow up. think wide.
Raj thackarey or marathi people for that matter dont't own Mumbai, its for everyone who had dropped their sweat and blood to make the city what it is today. People can't criticse the so called outsiders just because he is a marathi. Raj thackary is the perfect example of this.. he doesnt do good for his people he is just raking up STUPIDEST OF issues, and its surpising that he has so many idiot followers..!!!
Re: Mumbai is not OWNED by anbody.
by chintan jhunjhunwala on Oct 03, 2009 12:07 PM
egzactly wrote.if people start fearing people like raj thakeray who controls with some hired goons nothing much can be expected from the establishment.
Re: Mumbai is not OWNED by anbody.
by Amol Patil on Oct 03, 2009 12:25 PM
Mumbai is own by Maharashtra people or you can say Marathi people, let be very clear my friend. Same like Dubai is own by Arab people, anyone can work there but the credit goes to Arabs people forget those who had dropped their sweat and blood to make the city what it is today.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mumbai is not OWNED by anbody.
by hamid cjajaaca on Oct 03, 2009 02:34 PM
Amol......did u know that all dubai shaikh and government praise the efforts of all expetriates in dubai and complete UAE for thier efforts and also consider all indian, pakistanis and other nationalities as thier building partmenrs for the nation...NOT like this jerk Raj Thakrey .. jo apne pariwar ka nahi hua woh logo ka kya hoga kabhi jakar bude chahca ko chamac s epani to pilwa do.....what do u say
Re: Re: Mumbai is not OWNED by anbody.
by ahuja on Oct 03, 2009 03:17 PM
WHERE WERE U GREAT MARATHI MNS FOLLOWER, WHEN 10 TERRORISTS ALLOWED U TO SIT LIKE A DUMB LAST YEAR? WHERE WERE ALL UR MNS PEOPLE THEN MY DEAR? THAT TIME ONLY INDIANS (IRRESPECTICE OF CASTE, REGION AND RELIGION)SAVED US. OTHERWISE U'LL BE IN NARAK NOW. GROW UP AND THINK OF UR COUNTRY FIRST NOT LIKE MUMBAIKAR, NAGPURI, AURANGABADI, SHIRDIWALA LIKE THAT.
Re: Re: Mumbai is not OWNED by anbody.
by Bolo India on Oct 04, 2009 06:42 PM
Lets talk when you are able to make it a law! Dubai is owned by Arabs not dubaites!
