Re: This is very bad, very un!s1am!c...
by Mahesh Bhatt on Mar 28, 2009 07:34 PM
Hello Mr Zardari, I have a very interesting and original idea for a film. It will be a blockbuster. Especially if you act in it. Would u b interested? I'll send you a DVD or mail you the title of the film to watch.
Re: Re: This is very bad, very un!s1am!c...
by Vikram Bhatt on Mar 28, 2009 07:38 PM
What r u doing brother? He will demand 10% besides his fees. By the way which film is it based on, this original idea of yours?
Re: Re: Re: This is very bad, very un!s1am!c...
by Mukesh Bhatt on Mar 28, 2009 07:42 PM
What nonsense u fellows are talking?! If this Zardari chap acts in a Bollywood flick, the actresses would be covered from head to toe. Who would want to watch a film where the heroine even covers her toes? Let him rule his country of maniacs who k!ll each other. Keep him out of our movies. Already we have had so many flops.
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is very bad, very un!s1am!c...
by Zardari on Mar 28, 2009 07:46 PM
Yes, Please keep me out of your films. You people show your women folk half-naked and make money from it. You do not know that $.eX is something to be enjoyed in the hereafter. Not here, understand. That is why we r ready to give up our lives for the reward of 72 fresh specimens in the after-life.
Seen this movie.... Personal opinion: -- Concept is new to indian cinema but could have been used much much better to come up with sensible storyline. -- Shoddy editing and seems to have been hurried through to a close without making the user get engaged -- Unnecessary item songs which break the flow of the movie when people havent really understood the storyline -- Neil has to work on his accent and delivery for sure because sometimes you barely understand what he is saying -- Bips does a dumbass role which could have been performed by someone who takes lesser money from the producers :) -- Music is passe and re-recording is ABSENT in an Action-thriller -- Rahul dev's character is not explained completely and the entire placement of characters and development is incoherent....come on guys Hindi movie fans are much more intelligent
Bottomline: I dont think this movie would run though i personally feel new concepts, directors and actors need to get more hits; The story which could have been developed and ended like a Film Noir movie (ala Johnny Gaddar) ends up half-baked and BADLY SERVED.
Suggest you can see the movie to find out how to come out unsatisfied and feel how YOU can make a better movie out of the same budget and a similar storyline :)
Re: Saw this movie
by sivashankar TP on Mar 29, 2009 08:55 AM
so, in 2 months time, this movie will be on Zee TV or Sony or name any other channel :))))
You are an example of how corrupted and idiotic a person can be. Come on dude, just because no producer pays you for writing good reviews, you are constantly trying to show your non existent intellect off by condemning all the movies, whether or not they entertain. You must be kicked off rediff..for ever. Everyone hates you here.
Re: I_D_I_O_T #1
by raja sen on Mar 28, 2009 01:00 PM
u are right ...i m his raja sen's wife ..i know he is very idiotic person,sadist,ferine,swinish,obnoxious,fiend,gratuitous, imbecilic, negligent person he is ....if u don't may of the meaning of many words here ..refer to a thesaurus..thats what he would say
Re: Re: I_D_I_O_T #1
by Kunal Chandra on Mar 28, 2009 02:30 PM
instead of referring to a thesaurus...why don't you actually watch the film 2 see how bad it is....nd it is NOT ENTERTAINING...if dat is what u r lukin for...
Re: Raja Sen or the movie
by siddharth on Mar 28, 2009 12:43 PM
trust me...the movie is pretty decent.....if u watch it with sane people.... neil has done a pretty good job... bipasha as usual makes u feel that the movie wud do much better without her expressionless acting... Neil is someone really to watch out for...
Re: Re: Raja Sen or the movie
by Kunal Chandra on Mar 28, 2009 02:33 PM
bullshit...I've seen d film...substituting a coherent script with gimmicky happenstance and redundant twists doesn't a good film make....neil looked gud...but dats dat...nd kno...I don't want to be fed on "decent" films...especially when there are much better films playing alongside...
what else can one expect one bipasha is there.. our producers and directors have started treating India as US/ Europe where you have clubs.. pubs.. and good half- naked babes dancing to the beats of horrible music.. copied again from the so called western movies.. why they spend millions to produce such horrible movies and why people watch the movies which has neither any massage or good actors.. instead let such money be utilized for education and health care of children from ultra-poor families..
Re: donate money to charities...
by Manish Bhatia on Mar 28, 2009 12:28 PM
Dranil, you appear to be one of those morons waiting outside the pubs to exhibit his manliness by beating up on girls, and telling people that the only way to live their lives is by your rules. Instead of preaching to the world, why don't you go and donate all your money to Jhopad pati wallas, and let other people live their lives the way they want to... PS.. Msg is spelt MESSAGE and NOT MASSAGE..
Re: Re: donate money to charities...
by sivashankar TP on Mar 29, 2009 08:58 AM
donation is something that is done proportional to one's wealth and wastage is also done the same way!! it seems that Indian producers tend to be attracted to the 2nd option
Re: Question Five:Should Raja sen be kicked out of Rediff's offi
by raja sen on Mar 28, 2009 10:53 AM
please don't say what will happen to me (i m his "suffering wife") ..??
Guys, I seriously think a Ctitic should be an experienced Director. Hit or flop director.. or whatever... but he should be a director first of all. as to understand the movie you need not be a critic, u should have a directors mind..... Raja sahab... try to director a small video first and then be a critic.
Re: Ctitic should be an experienced Director
by secret secret on Mar 28, 2009 11:16 AM
on the contrary, a critic should NOT be a director, or anyone who understands any movie-making. he should just be a member of the audience who can articulate a common viewer's reaction to the movie. we as viewers want to know whether we will enjoy the movie, not how difficult it was to make this movie.
Re: Ctitic should be an experienced Director
by raja sen on Mar 28, 2009 09:45 AM
i totally agree with u ....well why not just watch a movie and make ur own mind ..rather waiting for some mind twisting reviews
Re: Re: Ctitic should be an experienced Director
by Kunal Chandra on Mar 28, 2009 02:37 PM
you all seem 2 be smart people...why don't you go ahead and make a better film?...a CRITIC should NOT try an articulate a common man's reaction...that is the job of a TRADE ANALYST...a CRITIC can only be looked upon as a bearer of subjective yet INFORMED opinion...I agree wid d last messg though...watch a film nd form ur own opinion...
Re: Re: What does 1 1/2 star mean??
by Lokanuraag BL on Mar 28, 2009 10:54 AM
This is the best review/answer given.. even Raja sen wouldn't have taught abt it :)
Re: What does 1 1/2 star mean??
by Rahul Bhardwaj on Mar 28, 2009 09:11 AM
yp . i dont know you and you dont know me . but dude this reaction of yours had me laughing for some time :-). you hit the reviewer where you should :-)
Re: What does 1 1/2 star mean??
by doganddonkey on Mar 28, 2009 11:32 AM
it has lots of meanings like
1. at Owners risk 2. don't forget this is a bad movie 3. the hall will be empty so you can go along with ur girlfriend. 4. not a bad movie if your are deaf