Discussion Board

Slumdog gets three Oscar noms


Total 993 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Sandy
Not the first Indian.
by Sandy on Jan 23, 2009 09:27 AM

Bhanu Attaiyya have won and oscar for best costumes in movie Gandhi. So this is not the first time an Indian might win an Oscar as being wrongly put by Media.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rohan madgaonker
Best of Luck
by rohan madgaonker on Jan 23, 2009 09:22 AM  | Hide replies

I hope that A.R. Rahman wins the oscar for both orignal score & song ...he deserves it..we indian are already proud of his achievemnets also a proud feeling for all indian actors involved in the movie...best of luck to Slumdog team

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sarathy narayanan
Re: Best of Luck
by sarathy narayanan on Jan 23, 2009 11:54 AM
he is tamilian

   Forward   |   Report abuse
asdf
Re: Best of Luck
by asdf on Jan 23, 2009 09:35 AM
The music of slumdog millionaire is average as per A R Rehman standards. We know what he is capable of. This tells us about the nomination process.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ram
Re: Re: Best of Luck
by Ram on Jan 23, 2009 10:11 AM
It doesn't tell anything about nomination process. Perhaps the average music given by Indian is much..much higher greater than Hollywood counter parts?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kailash gvs
Re: Re: Re: Best of Luck
by kailash gvs on Jan 23, 2009 10:49 AM
well said Ram!!

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Raimer Rainer
the movie is a disaster
by Raimer Rainer on Jan 23, 2009 09:18 AM

do not fall in the trap of oscar nominations. u will rue that u lost your money.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vidhya shankar
2 for Rahman
by vidhya shankar on Jan 23, 2009 09:02 AM  | Hide replies

If not for Original score Rahman is sure to get an Oscar for Original song. Only 3 songs were nominated and two of them were Rahman's and it can comfortably beat the other song nominmated for Wall.E

This is the first genuine Oscar for India (leaving Ray's Lifetime award).

Hats off to Rahman and proud to be a Tamil.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
muthalagu valan
Re: 2 for Rahman
by muthalagu valan on Jan 23, 2009 09:16 AM
hey, please dont use tamilian, hidhiwala, bla bla bla...
we are Indians...
We are happy to share a happiness with our religion, or language or state we belong...
Will you do that if something wrong has happnd...

By the way am also a tamilian..
but more than that am proud to be an Indian...
No harm intended...
Gud day guys...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
varinder mahey
Re: Re: 2 for Rahman
by varinder mahey on Jan 23, 2009 09:28 AM
agreee

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pramod mane
Re: 2 for Rahman
by pramod mane on Jan 23, 2009 09:13 AM
Firstly you have shown that you are Indian & then you came on your real religious image. Don't know when we will change our thinking of divide India. We non tamilians also proud to have the musicial like AR Rehman. We need to utilise this platform for delivering responsible messages.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raimer Rainer
Re: Re: 2 for Rahman
by Raimer Rainer on Jan 23, 2009 09:15 AM
the real state for tamils in the eelam.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sandy
Re: Re: 2 for Rahman
by Sandy on Jan 23, 2009 09:25 AM
Bhanu Attaiyya have won an oscar for Best costumes for Gandhi. So this is not the first time and Indian is getting an Oscar.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raimer Rainer
Re: 2 for Rahman
by Raimer Rainer on Jan 23, 2009 09:14 AM
u mean to say first it was ray and now it will be rayman?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rohith Pal
Not a gr8 movie
by Rohith Pal on Jan 23, 2009 08:57 AM  | Hide replies

This is just a publicity stunt. Remember 1994 every Indian participating in Miss world/Universe used to win the crown. Why rnt they winning now. This is because to bring in the bigger crowd to the theatres. But why? The reason simply being the big production houses of USA ( Warner bros, Universal) etc are now investing in Indian movies. I feel this movie is just OK and I would have rated Tare Zameen Par highly than this as it definitely had a social message

    Forward  |  Report abuse
X
Re: Not a gr8 movie
by X on Jan 23, 2009 09:04 AM
Its not a publicity stunt, its reality. The movie covers a lot of aspects that dominate the lives of 80% of Indians.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
asdf
Re: Re: Re: Not a gr8 movie
by asdf on Jan 23, 2009 09:30 AM
Its just bcoz what tehy hav shown is reality the movie got nominated for oscar. Rubbish.
If that is the case then all docuemntaries should be nominated.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SRINIVASA
Re: Not a gr8 movie
by SRINIVASA on Jan 23, 2009 09:47 AM
I feel atre zameen par was better than slum dog,bcoz at this point time education and supporting children in thier own plat form is the main thing, showing slum culture and slum children in movie was rubbish,if they really interested improve the living culture of children.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
prakash malshe
Slumdog
by prakash malshe on Jan 23, 2009 08:47 AM  | Hide replies

priya.malshe: arrey yar
poverty in India is poverty in true sense of words
a poor in US is still above Indian poverty line
samjhe?


Prakash: I posted all this dialogue on rediff. There are many more who share my views. Britishers used all nefarious means to rule India. They destroyed our Industry, cut the hands of weavers in Dhaka, and did many more inhuman things. Why some Britisher does not make a movie on this theme?


priya.malshe: the reasons are obvious
now that there's poverty in India is not a hidden fact
this movie is but a piece of fiction
obviously, the India side to it gives it a drastic effect but then thats what commercialised projects are about
we cant blame anyone for the movie


Sent at 08:42 on Monday
Prakash: Shall see the movie sometime and then comment on it. Gulzar, Rehman are great talents anyway. I did not require their winning the Oscar to appreciate their talent.I should however, blame them for accepting the title. It should have been slumdweller millionaire. then I wont feel offended.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Manoj K
Re: Slumdog
by Manoj K on Jan 23, 2009 09:00 AM
"It should have been slumdweller millionaire. then I wont feel offended"
Are you from the slums, to be offended by the title??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
prakash malshe
Re: Re: Slumdog
by prakash malshe on Jan 23, 2009 09:47 AM
Why call a human being a dog at all?

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Gabby
Re: Slum dog
by Gabby on Jan 23, 2009 08:52 AM
Whats your point???!! What are u trying to hint?? Try and be a bit short the next time...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Proud Hindustani
this movie has a hidden political agenda...
by Proud Hindustani on Jan 23, 2009 08:35 AM  | Hide replies

Since when did Lord Rama become of blue complexion ?? when did the H indus attack any one unprovoked ??? till today ??

    Forward  |  Report abuse
X
Re: this movie has a hidden political agenda...
by X on Jan 23, 2009 09:03 AM
Its an amazing movie. How does it matter what color rama is, its just a fictional character. The riots shown in the movie are post babri riots. The provocation and the assault both came from the majority community.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kuldeep bhartiya
Slum....Dog
by kuldeep bhartiya on Jan 23, 2009 08:31 AM

Slum...dog?
what it means?
I admit that india is poor country with approx. 25%-30% people living below poverty line.Sorry, if my statistics r wrong but what i mean by this is more than 20-30 cr people live in slums/huts or something close to that with low standard of living regarding food,clothing,shelter.Deliberately not mentioned medication and education facilities bcauz they hardly get it.
All this is true.
Coming to the pt. there have been numerous films made on this topic by indian directors but the western world hardly looked at it.
When a foriegner makes a film on same topic then it's being praised and nominated in oscar.
Does this mean we don't know how poor we r ?
Is it that we need foreigners to teach this?
Is it we people living here don't know abt ourselves?
A westerner can understand us better?

Sorry! i am not saying that it's a bad film.Neither closing my eyes on harsh reality but those people though living in slums r still humans not dogs.
They too wish to live in flats/bunglows..etc. but if we can provide them with a small house like our living room, then also they 'll be happy.
We got food/home/education from our parents and a better standard of living.Very few of us has earned it thru hardwork.

Well, ironically it's humiliating to say that we just earn money and fame by exploiting one's poverty.

They had not chosen but r made to live in slums!!!
It's we along with the government need to lift them rather than shamefully enjoying a movie on them.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
deepak yadav
High India
by deepak yadav on Jan 23, 2009 08:31 AM

At the end of movie...Jamal and Salim sit together at the top of a building and Salim says that this is the place where out slum was located few year back...Now India is the epicenter of world and we are sitting at the center of center.....This one dialogue is enough to tell the what india was..what it is and what is will be...poverty is the reality and we have to belive that it will not be the reality for longer

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 993 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message