Abhishek IS A GOOD AND NATURAL ACTOR......WE WILL LOOK FORWORD TO HIM FOR MORE MEANINGFULL ROLES LIKE SARKAR....IT IS INTERESTING TO WATCH THIS INTERESTING CONCEPT OF GAME SHOW....
the host in tv reality show is the boom these days and if abhishek is also doing the same, in my opinion, it will be the good one. abhishek can do it, he is good one......Manish Gandhi
the movie producers and tv channels are yet to know of the simple fact that bachchans dont have any market value right now...big boss worked because of its contestants not because of amitabh paa despite being a supposedly good movie didnt get any opening look at the ads that these bachchans are doing even the ad makers are overrating the value of these bachchans this guy abhishek cant get a opening and relies on his father to make his movies successful and on his wife for getting ads( the recent lux ad) the colors channel had a good strategy of depending on akshay but they seem to be moving to the bachchans ...which is not a gud strategy and will boomerang on them
Re: the overrated bachchans
by kk on Dec 27, 2009 03:49 PM
why do u think the bacchans are overated , wait till u see raavan , producers are not fools to invest money on actors who cant give them back , Abishek is good no matter what you guys say , he will prove , BIG BOSS 1 AND 2 LACKED THE SPARK , BIG B GAVE TEH SPICE AND ITS HIT SHOW . recent lux ad was fantasitc , lux is one of the best brands we have , they have professinal people to judge who is good and not . PAA IS hit 32 crores at box office , THEN FLOPS LIKE KURBAN AND ROCKET SINGH where hyou have youngesters like saif and ranbir
Re: the overrated bachchans
by deep earth on Dec 27, 2009 10:06 PM
i think ppl are hyping this superstar factor. In my view if an actor can't hold on to 75% full capacity in 75% of the released theatres at least for full 2 weeks or closer to that, and each time his movie releases then he is not a superstar. That means he is just a croonie who depends on 100 variables of movie making like any other guy. Ofcourse these days actors are all stars because they are born to superstars..
and endorsements are given not purely based on star power, it might be given because of of some behind the door business contracts/deals, fair or unfair, legal or illegal. At their level, the game is even irrespective of who the player is, because one needs another at some point of time or other depending on their fluctuating fortunes.
So dont call some one a star or a great actor just becoz of his endorsement power...you can call them powerful, influential..elite class etc
i think is not a big deal that he is going to host the show. Basically these days hosting is done by someone who is not doing that well in there original field which is in his case are movies.....considering that there are so many game shows being host by chote mote host so yet another show unless the show is very different and original its not going to run...