Discussion Board

Three held with SRK's credit card


Total 65 messages Pages | 1 | 2   Older >
Lakshmi
:)
by Lakshmi on Feb 18, 2008 08:46 AM  | Hide replies

he looks cute...i dont care about what others feel.........and i dont want you to comment on my comments..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Blueyes
RE::)
by Blueyes on Feb 18, 2008 09:07 AM
He looks horrible anbd so does your comment. That my comment on your horribly comment.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
imagine
RE::)
by imagine on Feb 18, 2008 11:41 AM
Iam more better than him...

try me..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Yogesh Jamdar
photo of SRK
by Yogesh Jamdar on Feb 17, 2008 11:57 PM  | Hide replies

SRK looks like an overgrown old monkey... really..i have now started believing in Darwin's theory for SRK atleast...



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Indian
RE:photo of SRK
by Indian on Feb 18, 2008 11:03 AM
you know darwin's theory? it says survival of the fittest.And SRK is the fittest in the bollywood industry.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Libran
does that mean no one else can be a Shah Rukh Kahn?
by Libran on Feb 17, 2008 09:42 PM

Is that a unique name? What if there was another guy with same name? He will have to move with ID all the time? Recently there was an article in one of the news papers in US about people who have same name as celebrities. May be some young Jurno can use that as a theme!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Blueyes
Raja Sen is a Non Existing Entity
by Blueyes on Feb 17, 2008 06:07 PM

Raja Sen the supposd to Rediff movie reviewer does not actually exist in reality. Rediff just fakes his name and wriote negative reviews for good movies and vice versa. Why?? Just because general public gets angry and post their anger in their site. Which obviously increases the number of hits to "Rediff.com". So ppl, please do not react much to this kind of planned filth. Now some idiotic ppl who are totally jobless and annoying might reply. Even they must be a spam.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
handsome smartie
PERSONS???????????????
by handsome smartie on Feb 16, 2008 04:05 PM  | Hide replies

There is no word in english dictionary as "Persons". Only the idiotic rediff reporters use "persons". When we refer to a single human being, we would say "a person", when we refer to more than one, we say "those people", however these jaahil rediff people use PERSONS and it sounds so cheap.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Joel Pinto
RE:PERSONS???????????????
by Joel Pinto on Feb 16, 2008 05:24 PM
actually... persons is a valid alternative to the word people...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Amol patil
RE:PERSONS???????????????
by Amol patil on Feb 17, 2008 11:29 AM
And people itself is plural.So rediff is trying to derive plural form of plural!How crap!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
thomas mathew
RE:PERSONS???????????????
by thomas mathew on Feb 17, 2008 12:58 PM
it can be used, in some context...see excerpt from oxford dictionary..

person
n      noun (plural people or persons)
1      a human being regarded as an individual. %uFFFDn individual characterized by a preference or liking for a specified thing: she's not a cat person. %uFFFD character in a play or story. %uFFFDn individual's body: concealed on his person.
2      Grammar a category used in the classification of pronouns, possessive determiners, and verb forms, according to whether they indicate the speaker (first person), the addressee (second person), or a third party (third person).
3      Christian Theology each of the three modes of being of God, namely the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

PHRASES
      in person with the personal presence or action of the individual specified.

ORIGIN
      Middle English: from Old French persone, from Latin persona 'actor's mask, character in a play', later 'human being'.

USAGE
      The words people and persons are not used in exactly the same way. People is by far the commoner and is used in most ordinary contexts: a group of people; several thousand people have been rehoused. Persons, on the other hand, tends now to be restricted to official or formal contexts, as in this vehicle is authorized to carry twenty persons.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
goodspeed
Stupid people....!!!!!!
by goodspeed on Feb 16, 2008 03:44 PM  | Hide replies

If this people would have auction this CC they could have made more money then this...there are lots of Crazy gals fan who are ready to buy SRK belonging for anything.....what do u says guys...???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Libran
RE:Stupid people....!!!!!!
by Libran on Feb 17, 2008 09:37 PM
And that would have been a easier way to get caught!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kaandy
RE:Stupid people....!!!!!!
by Kaandy on Feb 16, 2008 05:40 PM
I totally agreee. SRK's Name must have given them Lakhs of rupees for sure.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
werwer werwer
Smoking does that
by werwer werwer on Feb 16, 2008 02:03 PM  | Hide replies

Forty is new sixty if you are a smoker and shah rukh looks sixty.

However, he is a genuinely good person and I like him whatever he looks like.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Philo
RE:Smoking does that
by Philo on Feb 17, 2008 06:27 AM
no no no..thats the face of a steroid user..trust me...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
maram jyothi
SRK Pays bribe to journalists and Media...
by maram jyothi on Feb 16, 2008 12:32 PM  | Hide replies

SRK Pays bribe to journalists and Media for his films to be Blockbusters. He is nothing if kept away from Chopra's and Johars. His only films r block buster of Chopras Production. Aamir,Salman and Akshay are real super stars.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mr BALAJI
RE:SRK Pays bribe to journalists and Media...
by Mr BALAJI on Feb 16, 2008 12:40 PM
are you his personal secratary????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Saurav Hansdah
RE:SRK Pays bribe to journalists and Media...
by Saurav Hansdah on Feb 16, 2008 07:30 PM
Its wrong 2 say his films are blockbusters bcoz of YRF. Yash Raj films are blockbusters bcoz of Srk last year it was proved.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
neeraj kumar
Aamir wins over SRk
by neeraj kumar on Feb 16, 2008 10:25 AM  | Hide replies

And this is news to be made a one page article because....?????? Okay, wait... I get it. Thats the same card SRK used to pay this rediff guys to cook up news about him and butter up his movie reviews... Awh, Rediff never mind... For crying out loud what is his credit card theft got to do with his movies or to be discussed on a movie page???
This article was sinfully annoying.BTW These days SRK looks like his Madame Tussuad's wax statue that his half melted...

Incidentally, one famous media company has announced this:

"Aamir%u2019s forthcoming film, a remake of the Tamil thriller Ghajini has reportedly already made Rs 90 crore.... Till now, the record for pre-release movie rights was for King Khan's Om Shanti Om, which was Rs 73 crore.... While Shah Rukh's Om Shanti Om has made over Rs 90 crore in its 15th week, Aamir's Taare Zameen Par has already made Rs 85 crore in its eighth week. This despite the fact that Aamir's film was considered a more niche product.

%u201CThe number of prints that we released for TZP is just 470 as opposed to 800 plus prints of most blockbusters. Yet the film stayed on the sheer basis of its merit,%u201D Head of distribution, PVR, Gaurav Verma said."

You decide for your self...I am not being judgmental here :-)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Blueyes
RE:Aamir wins over SRk
by Blueyes on Feb 17, 2008 06:04 PM
Well Said Neeraj. Atleast someone is highlighting the truth here. The moral of the story is Shit Packs oops sorry Six packs are not enough to make a movie hit. There is something called acting also. Which unfortunately chain smokers will never know. All they know is Take young Sirens like DP and take them for a self satisfying ride.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ravinandanprakash agrawal
ab kya hoga..
by ravinandanprakash agrawal on Feb 16, 2008 07:18 AM  | Hide replies

ab kya hoga???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 65 messages Pages: | 1 | 2   Older >
Write a message