In the middle, writer did not knew where to take the movie. Abrupt cliched ending. It seemed like camera was held by a guy whose earlier job was taking Passport photos in studio. Saving grace was performance of actors, they tried to put a brave performance for this shoddy screen play. yikes.
I went to watch this movie expecting less crowd. Well there were less crowd and guess what people who went out during interval never returned back. Only crowd left were people like me. Went to the back seats and had one of my best make out session with my girl friend. And it was happy ending and my gf was so happy she wants us to get married soon. I say OH MY GOD ;|
I watched this movie only for Vinay Pathak, because he is an awesome actor and his films generally are entertaining.
But this movie is utter crap with senseless story and screenplay. The story idea that "money is not everything in life" is an encouraging one, but to make a good movie out of this idea requires some creative thinking, which this film lacks completely.
what an ambivalent, equivocal, non offending,ambiguous, diplomatic,evasive, non -commital, double-entendre, prevariated, sophistry ,subterfugal review!in short, a lousy movie and a scared reviewer who lacks self confidence or conviction in his beliefs.
Either critics don't know how to tell readers about movie or they are born nuts!
This guy praises every aspect of Vinay's acting but didn't says movie is bad or average... rather than says "Or a performance that will perhaps keep you in your seat for nearly two hours? I chose the latter."
Re: Rating 2 stars??
by vikram purohit on Dec 05, 2008 09:09 PM
Exactly.. Pretty dumb review.. I just scanned through some words and everything was good and then finally I see rating 2. What's that!!! Not good enough to watch??
Re: Re: Rating 2 stars??
by rahkes ijaj on Dec 05, 2008 10:10 PM
you should understand that one guy's acting doesn't make a movie. if you have gone through the review completely, you can notice that he said everything else is bad.