this is certainly a new disciple of Raja sen, who only has stamina to give 2 stars for any movie so sad, from where rediff gets this kind of movie psychos? they r really burden to the filmmakers, making them lose some profits of running the movie.
Every plot device used in the movie is cliched and as old as the mummies(or rather one Mummy and a lotta walking claypots ) in the movie themselves. The whole movie is seemingly put together from previous movies of the Indiana Jones series(which are all enjoyably silly). There are no dialogues, only one-liners and that too delivered half-heartedly by actors(sorely missing Rachel Weisz). I have to agree with the reviewer on everything about this movie. The first two films absolutely rocked!!! Don't know why most reviewers hated them, but the third movie just asks for it.
must b kidding when u say that mummy isnt a good series to begin with!!!!!! both previous parts were fun and i think this series has been the most watched one in India alongwith jurasic park. i dont know what kind of psychos are writing reviews nowadays? sure i am gonna watch this one
First two were too good.. I like the concept.. I think this reviwer is carrying his personal bias while writing.. Hey ppl.. I think its none other than Raja Sen.. Rediff is not finding suitable ppl for movie-reviews. Therefore Raja Sen has changed his name to Matthew Schneeberger.
Well i dont know but for rediff only Sharukh khan movies are a super hits , For me Mummy series has been superb and done well ..i am gonna definately watch this as well
If this reviewer is find Part 1 and Part 2 obnoxious , then certainly i am going to watch Part 3.
Mr. Mathew the Mummy series has been one of the biggest hits of all time....No one will watch a movie because of hype and i haven't met anyone who called Mummy 1 and 2 as bad.
well this stupid reviewer dosnt even know that the god father 3 was a big sucess and its rated equally to the first part on all the web sites and books
