Discussion Board View article

Total 244 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >
Padmashree
Shriya opp Rajini???
by Padmashree on Apr 18, 2008 07:14 AM  | Hide replies

Rediff that was Ur ques?? well if so., I feel she btr get lost from out wood & join Imran Hashmi. They seem the real pair..he pulling her lips & she letting her (few) clothes fall.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
voice
RE:Shriya opp Rajini???
by voice on Apr 18, 2008 11:00 AM
Well said...she is not needed in Tamil cinema.....even Vijay's ATM failed 50% 'coz of the story and 50% Shreya....I think it wil be good if Rajni considers doing movies like Chandramukhi where everyone can just enjoy a good laugh and all women come decently clad....infact he needs no heroine in his movie to attract crowd, he is THE CROWD PULLER.....the producers can consider doing some really enjoyable movies using him

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dawson
RE:Shriya opp Rajini???
by Dawson on Apr 18, 2008 10:04 PM
Ur right.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
vijay
Rajni is No 1 in India
by vijay on Apr 18, 2008 07:10 AM  | Hide replies


Sure Rajni is No 1 in India..here is the proof
1. Rajini just started acted in TN which has only 6% of indias population, but his movie is the indias costliest movie.

2. No other actor in india has fans and fans club out india by non Indians , like country in Japan, china...etc. Don't include NRIS.

3. His movie "sivaji" is the most successful movie in india not by returns but by the popularity.

4. We indians should be happy to see an indian actor successful performance, dont just put your racism comments for this too. Especially my Karnataka friends dont throw your bab words for this too. Some saying rajini said wrong about Hogenakkal issue, LOL you KN brothers never listen what they said but simply starting to make noise.... Jai hind

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Rajni is No 1 in India
by on Apr 18, 2008 07:44 AM
1. I agree that Rajini is heavily paid actor. Apart from Sivaji, do u think other Rajini movies are costlier??? Sivaji is costly coz, it is Shanker's movie. btw, there are more costlier movies in Hindi.
2. Rajini stopped approving new Fan club's from 1996. Dont lie, saying there are fan clubs for Rajini in Japan & China.
3. Sivaji is commercialy hit. big hit.. congratz to Rajini & his fans.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kanmani
RE:Rajni is No 1 in India
by Kanmani on Apr 18, 2008 08:10 AM
All Tamilians, including self, see his crap over and over. The producers know it. So they overpay Rajni and also make the movie a grand show. To be honest, there is nothing in his movies in content wise. THe same piece of shit. But of course, Rajni is a star.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aaron kumar
RE:Rajni is No 1 in India
by aaron kumar on Apr 18, 2008 11:00 AM
Its business dear,
Try to understand. Even Rajinikanth releases his next movie, people are going to watch and say he is old. Its obvious, thats his profession like any other movie star in the world he has to go by the market, ie what sells? Finally, profit matters rather than your comments. What else you want from Movies, apart from entertainment. The recent good movie I watched, Taare Zameen Par, but still few didnt like the movie. Rajini has a good formula and he is using it, you are not doing any social service by watching his movies. In fact, all movies, including Hollywood, Bollywood, kollywood, according to your standards is a piece of shit.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ajit should act as Robo.
by on Apr 18, 2008 05:07 AM  | Hide replies

This Old Man needs rest. Let him go to kailash.. why we people are disturbing him.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
agustine devraj
RE:Ajit should act as Robo.
by agustine devraj on Apr 18, 2008 05:27 AM
Can i know where r u from. Are you from TAmil Nadu. And who is your favourite actor .....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ganesan Vijayanand
RE:Ajit should act as Robo.
by Ganesan Vijayanand on Apr 18, 2008 05:31 AM
Loose moodu ra

   Forward   |   Report abuse
s vaidhya
RE:Ajit should act as Robo.
by s vaidhya on Apr 18, 2008 05:37 AM
hehe..ajith fana nee..adangu da..dei !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
benicenow
Well why not ?
by benicenow on Apr 18, 2008 05:04 AM  | Hide replies

Rajni is star ......and it will an honor for Shreya to work with him.........
You know How Bhool Bhulaiya is copied badly from Rajni's Chandramukhi still it success.........
One can feel power of Rajni ji..........


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Well why not ?
by on Apr 18, 2008 05:10 AM
FYI, Rajni's Chandramukhi is also copied form Manichitra thazhu (malyalam) & Aptamitra (Kannada)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
s vaidhya
RE:RE:Well why not ?
by s vaidhya on Apr 18, 2008 05:39 AM
but manichitra thazu and aapatmitra are not famous . Only rajini did chandramukhi and then u people started knowing the original version. That is Rajini !!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dawson
RE:Well why not ?
by Dawson on Apr 18, 2008 06:53 AM
No, absolutley wrong. Manachitrathazhu has been running on television for a decade in kerala, and all kearlites not only in kerala, but evn elsewere knows the movie.

Alot of people say tht manichitrazhu was the best out of all the versions, of course it's the original out of the lot.

Chandramukhi is nothing, rajinikanth is famous for everything, he doesn't need to prove a movie famous, only his fans come to watch him not the story or the actresses.

Chandramukhi ws a complete copy scene by scene w/all those songs and superstar stunts from kannada movie. Since kannada actor in aaptamitra ws a superstar, p. vasu suited the movie to him.

Likewise, p. vasu did the same to rajinikanth in chandramukhi. Come one, i don't rajnikanth needs to do any more movies, he shud just appear in reality shows, since rajinikanth is the only important part in his movies. Not story, actresses etc... Yes director is imp. b.c obviously he is the "director".

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Murali Tsr
RE:Well why not ?
by Murali Tsr on Apr 18, 2008 06:37 AM
Absolutely Rajinikant is the only super star. Other so called superstars- Guys like SRK, etc are nothing but chillar in front of Rajni. If Rajni dint act in Chandramukhi, the original version would have been known only in Kerala (while Mohan lal is also a good actor)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dawson
RE:RE:Well why not ?
by Dawson on Apr 18, 2008 07:00 AM
Yes, big thanx to p.vasu for showing this kind of picture in tamil and kannada.

Evn though, both p. vasu's films did not give the story the psycotic thriller feel to tamil and kannada films, as it ws serious a film w/subtle humor and strong characters as in fazil's film in malayalam. Still he did a good job in presenting it has technically a good film especially in tamil.

Manichitrazhu was made in 90's so it ws just plain excellnt screenplay, story, characters, genre tht it ws made into. Evn till now, manichitrazhu is the still the best w.o a single technicality to it.

It ws unlike those exagerrated hollywood horror films tht ar finally ridiculd in scary movie series.

Anyways, p.vasu is entertaining director and like evry rajnikanth movie, only entrtainmnt counts and thts wht we got.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Sharad Samal
RE:Well why not ?
by Sharad Samal on Apr 18, 2008 07:45 AM
Tu chillar re.SHUT UP.Who wants to see tamil movies.Amitabh is the biggest star ruling over so many decades.Even rajni has copied from amitabh .Billa is copy of DON which made rajni superstar.So do compare them.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Prashanth menezes
rajni
by Prashanth menezes on Apr 18, 2008 03:45 AM  | Hide replies

I think shriya should act opposite robot and rajani shuld take rest...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ganesan Vijayanand
RE:rajni
by Ganesan Vijayanand on Apr 18, 2008 05:33 AM
Dai loose .Rajini has another 50 years of acting left

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Dawson
RE:rajni
by Dawson on Apr 18, 2008 10:09 PM
Rajinikanth has another 50 years of entertaining left, not acting. Evn as a rajinikanth fan, i don't see any acting but only entertaining, and thts ok too.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:rajni
by on Apr 18, 2008 06:45 AM
so, Rajini will be dancing at the age of 108??
o-o

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mayawati
her screen name
by mayawati on Apr 18, 2008 01:15 AM  | Hide replies

no problem! what she will be called Robotress?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Xourav GanguLee
RE:her screen name
by Xourav GanguLee on Apr 18, 2008 02:51 AM


No! Shriya should act in Robot opposite Rajni Saar!

Shriya is a good actress.

This role should be given to Aishwarya!

She knows how to act with Robots! After all, she is married to one!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Xourav GanguLee
RE:her screen name
by Xourav GanguLee on Apr 18, 2008 02:52 AM

***

Sorry I meant to Say Shriya should NOT act!

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Xourav GanguLee
RE:RE:her screen name
by Xourav GanguLee on Apr 18, 2008 02:53 AM


Sorry I meant to say Shriya should NOT act

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vishal
Shriya is sooooooooo HOT!
by Vishal on Apr 18, 2008 12:03 AM

Shriya is sooooooooo HOT and is a much better actress than the ugly trashy Aishwarya Rai. All Aishwarya wants is cheap publicity. She is married now and she must retire. Aishwarya is a pathetic actress and no one will go to see her film. Shriya is a much bigger star than Aishwarya and will make the film a guaranteed blockbuster.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 244 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >
Write a message