why not? if rajnikanth cant? because the highly grosing movies not only in south india in the whole country its not Sharukh or amitab or salman its one and only rajnikanth and what more reason can have for him more than in film industry.....he desered to be regards RATHINAVELAN.T
He is the best idle example for "Hard work" will lead you to the top of the World. His inclusion will be historical for today's youth about this life's powerful Mantra. As already many mentioined, who ever is not recognising it is their loss not Rajini's. Great Aish, refused to act with him. So what, now Shreya is known all over the Globe, sherely because she is the heroine of Sivaji. Aish has to show her self to with bare back in International festivals, to reach this fame.
I too am not a diehard fan of Rajini. Still, there's no doubt that he's the most charismatic man on earth despite his age. As someone pointed out here already, as we can never see another MGR or Sivaji Ganesan, we're never going to see another Super Star too... Rajini will always remain as the one and only super star. His films never rely on the heroine to show up or comedians to pull their weight. They run only for the mere presence of Rajini. It's only the museum's loss and I don't think Rajini is someone who cares a wee bit for these kind of recognitions. He's the KING and finds the place in the hearts of crores of people in the south. Who cares if he doesn't find a place in a museum?!?
Though Rajni is regional actor he is still at everest top of Indian Film Industry. This is his amazing achievement! Amitabh was superstar because of huge audience (majority of hindi speaking people) for hindi movies. But Rajni has been Indian superstar by just acting in non-hindi regional movies. If Mr.Amitabh deserves the wax statue, Mr.Rajni very well deserves it.
Didn't rediff know Bollywood Super Star Amitabh was compared with Regional Actor Rajni? And ... Rajni won in the comparision (in terms of fame/fans/fanclubs/salary/recognition)
I don't think Shah Rukh Khan and Aishwarya Rai reached that altitude so they both don't deserve. Actually, Rediff should have asked this question "Shouldn't Madam Tussaud have Rajni's wax statue before SRK/AISH?"
Amitabh and Shahrukh are undeniably worthy of being immortalized in Tussauds'. Aishs' inclusion is funny (considering no significant contribution to cinema, indian or world). Rajni undeniably has the charisma to sway emotions, at least in the southern half of India, a one man force capable of generating mass hysteria as effectively as Amitabh and Shahrukh and definitely has contributed to Indi-cinema and has made waves in countries that even the badshah and shenshah have not been able to reach- Korea, Japan..
To find a place is not only unexpected, not being there would always make Tussauds incomplete.
And i am not even a die-hard rajni fan saying this.
Seeing number of responses Rajni is sure shot winner if voting is conducted for selection to Tussaud's including him as candidate. Salman voted to Tussaud's news have only one fourth of the number of responses.
RE:RE:RE:Fame
by useless bollywood on Nov 06, 2007 12:24 PM
u better take a chill pill... try to get a rajni movie's first day first show ticket in chennai below 1000 rs ... ur salman's movie ticket will go only for 50 rs in mumbai.
