dont comapare tamil actors with telugu actors, chiru, balakrishna, nag, venki al r bullshits. Tamil Actors r gr8. I am from hyd but i wont watch telugu films. Chiru is worst actor.
RE:Chiru is worst actor in telugu industry
by on Jun 06, 2007 06:22 PM
i think u r not from andhara leave andhrapradesh as soon as possible dont comare with tamil actors dont think as fool k
Hats off to the cinema producers in tamilnadu. These guys can teach marketing to any MBA graduate from any university.
They really know how to create a BIG HYPE of a stupid movie and using gullible press wallahs, they manage to create a big hype that will guarantee an initial push for their stupid film.
The cinema crazed uneducated brainless public in Tamilnadu easily falls for the hype of superstars and their films.
RE:RE:RE:All Hype and more Hype....
by prasanna t on May 29, 2007 05:54 AM
You are one of most idoitic person whom I have seen to write any comment. I guess the word hyper indicates the abnormal hyperactivity happening in my brain which is making you to give these kind of comments. Wash your brain and tongue and hand before commenting like these on any state , forget tamilians
Why there is always a big nuisance whenever there is an article on Rajini. Please note that Rajini may not be a great actor but he is certainly a superstar in his own terms. Most producers flock to people who keep cash registers ringing. That is the reason we have more Shah Rukh Khan films than Aamir or Nana Patekar films.
Similar is the case with Chiranjeevi who despite being a great actor was caught in the stardom which made him to concentrate on commercial cinema rather than realistic films.
Though don't compare Rajini and Kamal or Rajini and Amitabh or Chiranjeevi. All of them are unique in their own terms.
Rajini - Has a super style and comedy timing but a poor dancer Chiranjeevi - Near perfect in every department Kamal - Near Perfect in every department except executing few dance steps Amitabh - Great actor but a poor dancer
This is how it goes on. So nobody is great and nobody is poor it is only that they are good in certain areas and average in some.
We are lucky to have to many stars and actors for us.
RE:Dear all,
by on May 27, 2007 10:33 PM
I consider all these actors are OK in there way they appeal to the masses in their area of popularity so it's crap to compare them.If these actors were so great(incl all from the different corners) why dont we have international recognization in world cinema.You don't find this in hollywood , zealous fans comparing the crappy actors etc. , so we should be making good cinema popular in world and should stop comparing crappy actors which are popular in their areas but in no way can be compared. It's obvious ppl from TN will love Rajni, AP will love chiru , Kerala will love Mohanlal , UP & Bihar will love Amitabh , we cannot compare them because people who make them popular have different tastes local to that area and that is the reason also we rarely have movies that haveinternational appeal
RE:Dear all,
by Srini M on May 21, 2007 12:28 AM
This is extremely funny ! Kamal is a great dancer and probably the best actor in India. Chiranjeevi has a superstar image, but neither a good dancer nor a good actor.
RE:Dear all,
by Murali Cherukuri on May 24, 2007 02:08 PM
Hello
How can you u say Chiranjeevi is not good dancer, do you know the best dance directer of India Prabhudeva told that, Chiranjeevi is the best and number one Dancing Hero of Indian screen. i don't know you even seen any of the chiru's movies.
