Discussion Board

Chennai 600028: An entertainer


Total 10 messages Pages | 1
kaarthik jeeva
sounds like
by kaarthik jeeva on May 14, 2007 02:39 PM

it's not a remake of westside story,SRK starrer josh was the remake or copy of westside story.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Chennai 600028
by on May 03, 2007 11:27 AM

Vey Very Bad review[1/2 *] of a ver very good movie

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rathnavel Ponnusamy
Shortcoming
by Rathnavel Ponnusamy on May 03, 2007 09:19 AM

Nothing about the movie...Its about the review...The review is atleast two paras short and the no. of stars is also 1 short...

Chennai - 600028 is really awesome stuff and next only to Guru and Mozhi in this year's out of the blue sky stuff...The reviewer missed Nithin Sathya who always remains unsung. His acting apart, Premji Amaran's BGM also deservs applause

ENNA KODUMAI SIR ITHU

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rojo Don Poho
Sounds like
by Rojo Don Poho on May 02, 2007 12:07 AM  | Hide replies

Sounds like its a remake of a famous 1960's movie of Hollywood "West side story" ...only the cricket is different.

Why don't indian cinema try to come up with original stories? SAD

    Forward  |  Report abuse
venkat m
RE:Sounds like
by venkat m on May 02, 2007 05:24 AM
Similar plot outline does not mean its a remake.

Why don't some people be more careful about their accusations?
SAD

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rathnavel Ponnusamy
RE:Sounds like
by Rathnavel Ponnusamy on May 03, 2007 09:22 AM
Its horrible that people like you have a take on movies like this just to show off your knowledge on so called World Cinema...Dude, I have seen them both,,,And if anybody can term it an inspiration or remake of West Side Story, then his West Side of brain has become history...I mean its hightime he/she checked his senses...One basic quality of reviewing/commenting is to do so only after watching the movie..Do that first

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SuperStar
Why the REVIEW is SO SHORT ??? REASON ???
by SuperStar on May 01, 2007 04:23 PM

i wonder why the Hell whenever SRIRAM IYER wrote a film review for Tamil films he love to keep the review SHORT if the movie is nice. But when he gave 1.5 star for the movie then he will start to lecture the director,producer and so many people and will write such a long REVIEW but when he gave 3.5 star for this movie then he talk SO LITTLE about the movie...is this wat we call MOVIE REVIEW ???

very PATHETIC ! just change the reviewer or change the mentality.

Do take NOTICE sriram Iyer love to UNDER ESTIMATE tamil cinema ...i duno why the HELL he cant use KOLLYWOOD term to refer tamil cinema ?

and finally why he LOVE to CRITIC tamil cinema very much ? juz compare Kollywood with all latest BOLLY craps which FLOPPED miserably !!!!!!!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
saran an
rewiew is like one liner.....
by saran an on May 01, 2007 08:53 AM

Gud movie review is not bad but theres lot to tell abt the movie...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sangeetha
hi kanna
by sangeetha on May 01, 2007 12:20 AM

hi sampath we are so thrilled that your film has done well and happy to know that you have done well ......... you are a star..........always wishing you the best in life.......... sangeetha krishna and nams

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 10 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message