Comparing Fanaa and Krrish isnt fair. They both are pathetic movies. I happened to watch it(krrish) last night. Let me not get carried away with the unnecessary patriotism (its good 'cause its an indian superhero), and charm of a single man. Yes, I do agree with you all. Hrithik is just brilliant in this movie ! And the only good thing about this movie is Hrithik. some of my observations
1) Why dont Rakesh roshan simply admit that he is a copy cat ? Krish has nothing original to cheer for. Spiderman, Superman, ET, CatWoman, Matrix, Minority Report (and the list goes on). All that are original in krish are worthless (Forced comedy, Melodrama)
2) Why dont they simply admit that its also a collective marketing effort ? Paying all reviewers and creating hype for a worthless product to generate curiosity ? goodies for bribing kids ? Advertisements of Tide, Bonvita, Faber Castle ?
Justice is not done in terms of creativity, for such a big budget with enormous hardwork from the crew. Matrix and Spiderman are appreciated because they are originals.
Its easy to fool indian audience. Now movie makers are getting in to that serious business. When would we ever evolve ?
krish is one of the best movies I saw,Hrithik is amazing as an actor,dancer and stunts are mind blowing.I watched it with my family and everyone seemed to enjoy every bit of it.I liked the songs too.I think Rajesh Roshan always keeps the best music for his brother.I have decided to watch all hrithik's movies after watching krish
its a huge success for rakesh roshan as he once again takes the risk. he is the man behind making bollywood into the hearts of hollywood. the action sequence are superb and so well done by him that we call him INDIAN SPEIRGBURG.
Fanna has good theme, excellent music and ofcourse the best actor. Krishh did not have any of these. So the comparison is useless. Fanna is much better than Krishh.
RE:Fanna Vs Krishh
by tushar mundada on Jun 30, 2006 05:52 PM
though fanaa is a good movie & aamir have performed his best but it is a type cast moovie in a sence that the hero leaves the heroin & meet her at the end again & after knowing truth she uses her conscience but KRRISH is not a type cast moovie it is "sci-fi+action+lovestory" ,it will change the trend of present bollywood movies hence it is a "trendsetter" moovie not a trend follower & hrithik have played it amazingly,no one can be considered in place of hrithik in role of krishna. hence i favours many folds krrish than fanaa.
RE:Fanna Vs Krishh
by tushar on Jun 30, 2006 05:47 PM
though fanaa is a good movie & aamir have performed his best but it is a type cast moovie in a sence that the hero leaves the heroin & meet her at the end again & after knowing truth she uses her conscience but KRRISH is not a type cast moovie it is sci-fi+action+lovestory ,it will change the trend of present bollywood movies hence it is a "trendsetter" moovie not a trend follower & hrithik have played it amazingly,no one can be considered in place of hrithik in role of krishna. hence i favours many folds krrish than fanaa.
Fanaa is an anti-national movie, it justifies kashmir terrorism, it puts pak and india at the recieving end of kashmir terrorism!!!!
We Indians are the most un-patriotic fools to watch such an anti-national movie.. but then afterall are'nt we the ones who still watch movies of guys who trumpet their proximity to dawood
