We all are aware glamour world is about money,high society,fame,name. But all that glitters is not gold. The darker side of glamour world is compromise at any cost to achieve , and be a part of this fraternity.
Not many make it to the top. we have heard of red-tapism,similarly casting couch is the other name of it in glamour world.
casting couch exists very much in film-dom.In fact if u open ur eyes, it exists in all fields, be it in office, or anywhere.It gets highlighted in film-dom as personalities are in public eye all the time.
Let us accept the fact that it exists.Wannabe's would do anything to reach the top.
I guess most of us might have watched the movie "Page 3". What happened in that? There is a producer who asks his assistant "DEGI KYA?" when tara sharma aspires to become an actress. What happens in the end? In the end, she says that she would be doing a film... Truth,truth, bitter truth...
I think what all media does now a days is awful and cheap publicity.They picked Shakti because he is a celibrity, no one could have bothered about a common mans version.If they want a public opinion to stablish a fact then they should conduct a mass view campain and the results will not yes will not be enchouraging. We all talk crap sometimes in life, all of us,but it dosent mean much importance.On the other hand JUST imagine what an aquentance would think and presume in our society if he sees that girl(the interviewer)coming out of a hotel room late at night? I leave this for people to react.
Let me start by saying what Shakti did is the "bare fact" of the "glamour world". Having said that, I would like to ask each one of you what India TV showed was "Shakti being exposed" or "Shakti being framed"? Look at it this way, a girl is calling you for last 6 months, she invites to a "HOTEL ROOM" at odd hours, and also offers you alcohol. My question is "what kind of girl she is"? Now, add to it the fact that she is an adult who knows exactly what she is doing. I have no sympathy for Shakti, but at the same time I dont think it is completely Shakti's fault.
It would have been ONLY SHAKTI'S FAULT if he would have met or talked to the girl for the first time and straightaway asked her for having sex for any kind of favor. But all of us know it was not the case. The so called "undercover reporter" was a part of a bigger plot. Plot to "Frame Shakti" and also make India TV a "Hit News Channel" over-night. I am asking how may of us ever watched India TV news channel before this episode? Because Aaj Tak did undercover things and then Zee News did some, India TV didnt want to be left behind in this race and so they had to "FRAME" someone. Unfortunately, it was Shakti...
In fact the things are in every field looking for their progress. But what is needed is to check them and not to expose them. I think media should now pay attention towards the big bosses i.e. the IASs and IPSs . The other field is the scientific world . Every research lab should be shooted secretly. Business class should not be ignored. Moreover every field should be identified , exposed and checked.
Big question: Are these exposers the real problem before INDIA or the others like poverty , unemployment, water problem , pollution and what not?
