hello is this a movie still they r exploiting the audience in the name of sex but it was a ultimate diasater which the director and actors will relize in long run hope it changes in future
Read the reviews posted here. I think this movie is a good experiment in using symbols in film making, like for example, the blowup of the ferocious animal always seen behind the killer. Also the movie has brocken all traditional way of story line in cinema where the hero some how escapes. Here that is not the case. The second half is quite a thrill and it defyies all standard formula in story line. Editing is also crisp and good. A must watch for film institute students.
This is movie worst movie i have evern seen. There is nothing in it. Picturisation is worst. At least picturisation should be proper. There is no story. Till the end it is total confusion. Leading actor was worst with no expression. He cannot be called as actor. Actress did quite good job. But movie story didnot have any logic. They tried to make movie in hollywood style but made worst ever hollywood movie. No picturisation,No acting, No story, No Music nothing. I ask the director to tell the story for this movie. Becoz i still could not understand movie and its story. I asked around 15 to 20 people who watched movie with me even they could not understand what is story and what is logic in it. They asked me other question that why directors are making this type of movie
A sound crap. I had no expectations from this movie bt I watched the movie as it was a thriller and I am a thriller freak. But, this movie created a new genre.
I must agree with Sreekanth. The reviews in rediff are getting worse. If C U @ 9 is a bad movie(i have not seen this movie), this review cant get worst. Rediff.com please dont pay these fools who write reviews just for the sake of getting paid. Very very very unprofessional writing. Hope to read better reviews here after(I mean better written).
