Correct me if I am wrong, but I always believed Salim, the prince in this epic story was Jahangir, the son of the great Emperor Akbar, and not Shah Jahan. At least, rediff.com should be a reliable source for such information !
Correct me if I am wrong, but I always believed Salim, the prince in this epic story was Jahangir, the son of the great Emperor Akbar, and not Shah Jahan. At least, rediff.com should be a reliable source for such information !
It was a love story about Prince Jehangir (Salim) and Anarkali, definitely not about Shah Jahan ... Mumtaz is supposed to have been Shah Jahan's girl ...
Looks like our writer is rewriting history. Salim is Jahangir and its his love for Anarkali which the Epic is all about. So where does Shah Jahan fit in. Agreed that Anarkali was a beauty and Shah Jahan would have given his soul to be Jahangir's shoes. But then our writer would want to consider the option of Jahangir building the Taj Mahal for Mumtaz Mahal. That's history rewritten at its best
Get your facts right. The legendary love story is of Young prince Salim (Later Emperor Jehangir) and Anarkali. Not Shah Jehan. Nobody out there proof-reads your reports, do they?
Pradeep Bandekar, U surely made late K.Asif move in his Grave when U misquoted the article. Such blunders aren't expected inthis professional world, especially when U urself quote the MAGNITUDE of the film's success in the past. Cheers... Yogi
