I think the people of Sci-fi are freak. The program that i saw yesterday was not a documentary, it was like a movie itself. Documentaries are supposed to reflect truth not to spread rumours.
RE:Sci fi is freak
by MissNetta on Jul 21, 2004 07:25 AM
I totally agree with you. I am a little ashamed that even watched that mess. Although I must say the Sci Fi channel is one of my favorites, I am very disgusted by that so called documentary. My opinion at this point is so what if some of what they found was true...so what? The point of the documentary was lost the minute they sent whoever that man was the suppossed interviewer..to meet with Minoj. Lata
That film was a joke! Kinda reminded me of the "documentary" film, The Blair Witch Project. I would think that Shyamalan would grant an in-depth interview to 60 Minutes before he would agree to a three-hour mockumentary on the Sci-Fi Channel. Besides, the production was cheesy and really stretched the "suspension of disbelief" concept. Didn't believe it for a minute...
I have also seen the same documentary. What do you think about Manoj. Is he rally a freak?
I dont understand what Kahn will get after making such a foolish documentary. What he wanted to prove?
I really dont understand.
Manoj Shyamalan is an intellegent person. Kahn wanted to say that he Manoj is making movies not by his intelligence but by his contacts with the other world. This is ridiculous. This is insult of Manoj Shyamalan.
Kahn was behaving and talking like a child in the whole documentary. According to Kahn M. Shyamalan is having contact with the spiritual world, he tlaks with the spirits. IF this is the thing then all horror movie makers are of same kind. Isnt it?
Kahn is having problem with M. Shyamalan's every move. He is having objection on Shyamalan changed his name to Night, Why he(M.N.S.) is wearing a different kind of necklace...etc
What that guy Kahn is thinking I dont know.
I think Kahn is ruining image of Shyamalan.
I dont like the documentary at all. It was full of stupidity. It was insult of Syamalan and nothing more.
this just Ticked me off no end & I could hardly Wait to see this, From a Great and Relatively New" Director...CHRIST, that's 3 Hours of MY LIFE I'll Never Get back, all for a MOVIE PLUG..Nothing MORE....and the strange part is the Guy is GOOD, he didn't Need to DO this....Makes me think LESS of HIM NOW
nice article ,, u ripped thru the crap .. if i can call it that ..
but one slip .. the part abt the house in signs , u said that in the movie signs , its the house bruce willis lived in , But it was mel gibson and not bruce willis who was the protagonist of signs
small error .... but noticeable to any m n s fan ,
You guys are sick. You, Prem, are insulting the intelligence of the readers more by this stmt:
"The camera pans over a harvested cornfield that makes you think of a similar sequence in Signs and finally focuses on a house that is a dead ringer for the home of the Bruce Willis character in that film."
Go watch the movie. Bruce Willis in Signs?! ... You are writing reviews and there are ppl at rediff who are supposed to verify it be4 publishing...
Pls leave Manoj alone. He's doing a wonderful job.
