JLO is a hollywood star know for music, then started in acting did a few good movies, and some where good, some where flops, no big deal so what her makes her diffrent then Rani, and indian actress, that acts in indian? her colour? her values? tell me ? oh cuz she is dose not how to act in Hollywood? big deal there is so many actor and actress out there that are trying to make it in the big screen, Cuz rani is indian makes it diffrent? i think this is a great chance for both actor and actress, is two cultures comming together !!
I think J Lo better watch out when Rani hits the Western Big Screen! J Lo is over rated anyways. Come on, J lo was nominated sexiest female twice in a row, thats because there was no INDIAN competition. Lets see J Lo enter a Miss Universe/World contest and see who wins. I think Rani and Most of the Indian Actresses are Incredibly Mesmerizing and there is no way any western / European Model or Actress would even try to compete with the Indian Beauties!!
I have never heard nor would I hear of something so stupid. J Lo is way beyond for Rani and this makes the comparision a farce.Rani cud better think itz her amazin luck.
Never heard of anything more rubbish like that! Rani is not even anywher close to JLo. I mean how the media would make titles of some simple news articles is just tooooo much really.
Talks about the success of Chalte Chalte, I sometimes really wonder what it takes in India for a movie to be hit. I saw this movie which was not anything more or less than a stupid bore movie. Except for a couple of sequences and Rani-SRK fresh look , movie has nothing to offer at all!!! Saathiyaa was so so much better, at least was successful in touching the subject!
Rani is an average actor, certainly not a bad one. But have to realize it takes a lot to be in hollywood! They act, u know!
I believe that Ben Affleck would be a better choice to act opposite Rani because he is well known and the pair would look handsome. Ben is also good at comedy.
