A country is prosperous only when the borders are secured with a strategic vision to ensure stable growth while countering Chinnas hegemonic designs...
Nehru gave away strategically located Tibet which is origin of all the major rivers to China and also surrendered UN security council seat to Chinna..
This alone has costed India dearly and will continue to be a thorn in India Strategic vision..
Moresoever, Indian CPM/I and their stooges are parasites who thrive on Indian blood and continue to promote anarchy, lawlessness in India...
Ironman Sardar Patel had warned Nehru against Chinnas designs and also ensured growth of Indian domestic Industry in pre partition India by countering Jinnah's move to impose heavy tax on Industries mostly in India while allowing Feudal land lords who supported Pakistan to be tax free...
Now that the true history is there in open domain.. CPM/I phoney , deceitful historians ploy has been exposed.. But the CPI/M breed is shameless to continue on the forum with lies and lies despite getting bashed up !!!!
Frankly speaking nehru did the right thing....he is our best PM till date.....he was a visionary with a scientific attitude....and he built the foundations of modern india......
we today see what would have happened if what tata had his way.....imagine tata birla ruling like present day adani ambani....true tata birla may not have gone to the extent adani and ambani are doing today....but today thanks to nehrus policies we have done all round development.
as for nehru saying he hated the word profit....I find it difficult to believe he would say such a thing....okay he adopted a socislist india, the people being poor our country being under developed having so many different languages castes cultures religion....recognizing that was more important....creating a base for what tata had in mind was important....okay nehru made mistakes...who doesnt? but his achievents were much more than his mistakes
and sayjng patel would have been a better PM and would have agreed to tata's plan is mere dpeculatpn....also patel was dead by the time elections were held .....patel was dead before nehru bevsme PM
Re: Hi
by Rajnath Guru on Jan 14, 2019 12:32 PM
A country is prosperous only when the borders are secured with a strategic vision to ensure while countering Chinnas hegemonic designs...
Nehru gave away strategically located Tibet which is origin of all the major rivers to China and also suurendered UN security council seat to Chinna..
This alone has costed India dearly and will continue to be a thorn in India Strategic vision..
Moresoever, Indian CPM/I and their stooges are a parasites who thrive on Indian blood and continue to promote anarchy, lawlessness in India...
Ironman Sardar Patel had warned Nehru against Chinnas designs and also ensured growth of Indian domestic Industry in pre partition India by countering Jinnah's mpve to impose heavy tax on Industries while allowing Feudal land lords who supported Pakistan to be tax free...
Now that the true history is there in open domain.. CPM/I phoney , deceitful historians ploy has been exposed.. But the CPI/M breed is shameless to continue on the forum with lies and lies despite getting bashed up !!!!
Re: Hi
by Rajnath Guru on Jan 14, 2019 12:32 PM
A country is prosperous only when the borders are secured with a strategic vision to ensure while countering Chinnas hegemonic designs...
Nehru gave away strategically located Tibet which is origin of all the major rivers to China and also suurendered UN security council seat to Chinna..
This alone has costed India dearly and will continue to be a thorn in India Strategic vision..
Moresoever, Indian CPM/I and their stooges are a parasites who thrive on Indian blood and continue to promote anarchy, lawlessness in India...
Ironman Sardar Patel had warned Nehru against Chinnas designs and also ensured growth of Indian domestic Industry in pre partition India by countering Jinnah's mpve to impose heavy tax on Industries while allowing Feudal land lords who supported Pakistan to be tax free...
Now that the true history is there in open domain.. CPM/I phoney , deceitful historians ploy has been exposed.. But the CPI/M breed is shameless to continue on the forum with lies and lies despite getting bashed up !!!!
Re: Hi
by CHAKRABORTY I on Jan 18, 2019 04:46 PM
vaidya ur a parasite of highest order spreading negativity and bogus logic .You are amoron making adonkeyout of ourself.Dont tax your brain so much.Better take your daily medication and take a nap
Re: Hi
by Makarand Deshmukh on Jan 18, 2019 11:35 AM
Are you the sole owner of the righteousness? Tatas have been unflinching in their dedication and integrity towards nation. Earning money or running business does not mean, you are thief. A person with merge salary, doing corruption is thief. When Nehru looked at socialism for answers, rather looking inwards, he was at fault, and the country suffered.
Autocratic Nehru Building the country or promoting self at the expense of country's national interest????
Sacrificed national interest at the altar of self glorification.. Mostly with autocratic means leaving behind a legacy of yesmen, favoritism, nepotism ...that is still evident in the sycophantic culture of the party....
Frankly, so trivial. Nehru was trying to build a nation rooted on modern thoughts. JRD was interested in building and expanding a business empire. There are a lot of differences between the two.
Re: Patel and JRD
by Rajnath Guru on Jan 14, 2019 12:55 AM
Building the country or promoting self at the expense of country's national interest at the altar of self glorification.. Mostly with autocratic means leaving behind a legacy of yesmen, favoritism, nepotism ....
Re: Patel and JRD
by Makarand Deshmukh on Jan 18, 2019 11:39 AM
You have not known Tatas. They are the responsible for industrial revolution in India. Heard about IISc, Air India, all started by Tatas. Always thought about country, worked for betterment. Come out of Kejriwal mindset of self glorification. All are thieves except me.
. After the deluge of all these damages like Bench fixing the constituent Assembly by easing out the Governor General whose name is talked about in this write up our FREE, BOLD DEMOCRATIC PRESS ALWAYS has always DANCED TO the interests of NEHRUDOM; almost all India too. Are we to feel proud that these are told now and to think better now than never.\"He was concerned that public support to Rajaji would earn Nehru\'s displeasure. the transparent leader that he was, he communicated this decision to Nehru when he met him the next time.On hearing about the Tatas\'s support to Swatantra Party, Nehru blew up, \'You have no business to do that.\'In order to pacify him and clarify his stance, JRD wrote a detailed letter to the prime minister dated 16 August 1961: n the general elections of 1971, Naval Tata (Ratan Tata\'s father) decided to stand for elections as an Independent candidate from the South Bombay constituency.It is believed Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was displeased with the Tatas\'s attempt at contesting elections against the Congress candidate.Furious and unforgiving, she is supposed to have told JRD, \'So the Tata Group wants to set up a front against me?\'Indian democracy is pretended democaryY3WkR.PONNAMBALAM
. After the deluge of all these damages like Bench fixing the constituent Assembly by easing out the Governor General whose name is talked about in this write up our FREE, BOLD DEMOCRATIC PRESS ALWAYS has always DANCED TO the interests of NEHRUDOM; almost all India too. Are we to feel proud that these are told now and to think better now than never."He was concerned that public support to Rajaji would earn Nehru's displeasure. the transparent leader that he was, he communicated this decision to Nehru when he met him the next time.On hearing about the Tatas's support to Swatantra Party, Nehru blew up, 'You have no business to do that.'In order to pacify him and clarify his stance, JRD wrote a detailed letter to the prime minister dated 16 August 1961: n the general elections of 1971, Naval Tata (Ratan Tata's father) decided to stand for elections as an Independent candidate from the South Bombay constituency.It is believed Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was displeased with the Tatas's attempt at contesting elections against the Congress candidate.Furious and unforgiving, she is supposed to have told JRD, 'So the Tata Group wants to set up a front against me?'Indian democracy is pretended democaryY3WkR.PONNAMBALAM
. After the deluge of all these damages like Bench fixing the constituent Assembly by easing out the Governor General whose name is talked about in this write up our FREE, BOLD DEMOCRATIC PRESS ALWAYS has always DANCED TO the interests of NEHRUDOM; almost all India too. Are we to feel proud that these are told now and to think better now than never."He was concerned that public support to Rajaji would earn Nehru's displeasure. the transparent leader that he was, he communicated this decision to Nehru when he met him the next time.On hearing about the Tatas's support to Swatantra Party, Nehru blew up, 'You have no business to do that.'In order to pacify him and clarify his stance, JRD wrote a detailed letter to the prime minister dated 16 August 1961: n the general elections of 1971, Naval Tata (Ratan Tata's father) decided to stand for elections as an Independent candidate from the South Bombay constituency.It is believed Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was displeased with the Tatas's attempt at contesting elections against the Congress candidate.Furious and unforgiving, she is supposed to have told JRD, 'So the Tata Group wants to set up a front against me?'R.PONNAMBALAM
