Discussion Board

There's an orchestrated campaign to malign Aadhaar: Nilekani


Total 9 messages Pages | 1
susarla suryaprakasam
There's an orchestrated campaign to malign Aadhaar: Nilekani
by susarla suryaprakasam on Jan 12, 2018 10:43 AM

That too by Courts supposed to be impartial and supposed to be mum about any thing in which they have no knowledge to claim, like an Auditor certifying stock verification of a multi product manufacturing company as having verified R/M, W-in-P, & FGs.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sohan prabhakar modak
e6e5QAadhaar
by sohan prabhakar modak on Jan 12, 2018 07:16 AM

Nilekani\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s Aadhaar is a fraudulent protocol with faulty and easily retrievable identity protocol violating all safety norms tht harm privacy rights of citizens. He is also mannipulating courts by appointing SC lawyers opposing him to UIDAI board.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
janga sridhar
Dictator nilenkani ?
by janga sridhar on Jan 12, 2018 01:36 AM

"If you are just taking a negative view, and not a constructive view, then you also have other (negative) reactions. I think, everybody has to accept Aadhaar is here to stay," The former UIDAI chief said.

Nation does not run on your whims and fancies Mr.Nilenkani. To save your skin you will make such stupid statements. Prove that Aadhaar is safe. Prove that no one can duplicate my finger prints by 3D printing.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
chanakya maurya
The damage has already been done.
by chanakya maurya on Jan 11, 2018 10:42 PM

and it is irrevocable.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sudarshan Nityananda
Unbiased view needed
by Sudarshan Nityananda on Jan 11, 2018 09:09 PM

Nilekani has said "I think this is a very significant announcement by UIDAI and in some sense it really makes the case against it go away," . He therefore admits that there was a case against the way Aadhaar was administered which has now been corrected by the virtual ID.It would have been better instead of generalizing and condemning those who question the security aspects of Aadhaar, he could have gracefully accepted that there was a flaw and offered some solutions. If there was no flaw, then the virtual ID would not be needed. As a technocrat , we would expect Nilekani to take an unbiased view and refrain from blanket condemnation of all those who raise doubts about the security architecture around AAdhaar.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 9 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message