It defies all logic. This decision is unfair in all accounts. It is correct, if the Govt has taken same yardstick for offenders more than this legitimate activity. People will think, what crime I have done ? My money, in a remote village, I have to face all these unpleasantness
has to withdraw money should he come and withdraw at one go? Or if he comes after 1 week, is he allowed to withdraw again? Then what r the criteria to follow? RBI should explain clearly so that there is no confusion.
Re: Why No Ink on Forehead ??
by Vivek Singh on Nov 16, 2016 06:19 PM
By this decision queues have come down dramatically in those branches were ink is being used.
Re: Ink on Fingers - A master stroke for Black money brokers
by SYEDMOIZUDDIN on Nov 16, 2016 05:54 PM
why the thing initially has not done? because he him self takes all decisions. not consulting experts. but his friends.
yes it is good suggstion for putting ink on the fingures of each person who collect cash?? but the same colour ink should not used in the proposed election to be held at Tanjore and aravakurichi etc.. but it should be different clour and hand for the persons who casted their vote , in any vote booth??
nothing is going to achieve,1) fake 2000 notes caught in bangalore,2)corruption would be with new 500 and 2000 3) terrorists do electronic transfer of money.4) black money people will manage with banks in their local areas. hence no objective achieved.