Discussion Board View article

Total 7 messages Pages | 1
Santosh
Anuj is bad.
by Santosh on Nov 02, 2016 08:35 AM

Tanu, falls first tour second.. VvmC.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rajpal Rana
MISTRY REMOVAL WAS NECESSARY TATA'S
by Rajpal Rana on Nov 01, 2016 10:06 PM  | Hide replies

RATAN TATA YOUR THINKING IS ALWAYS NEGATIVE AND UNSUCCESSFUL IN MANY PROJECTS THE DEPTH OF WHICH CANNOT BE ASCERTAINED, UNFAIR IN USING TRICKS TO BE ON TOP OF TATA GROUP'S,THE NELCO CANNOT BE FORGOTTEN WHICH WAS UNEXECUTED .HON'BLE MADAM MAMTA BANERJEE CHIEF MINISTER IS THE ONLY CHIEF MINISTER WHO TOOK A STRONG ACTION AGAINST THE TYRANNY OF YOUR EXERCISE OF YOUR POWER AT SINGUR IN SETTING UP NANO CAR PROJECT AND SHE CANCEL YOUR TRUCULENCE TO GRAB HUNDRED OF ACRES OF FERTILE LAND OF FARMERS.MR.CYRUS MISTRY IS YOUNG AND YOU WANTED TO RULE TATA GROUPS FROM BEHIND TREATING HIM AS A PUPPET YOU KNOW VERY WELL THE POWER AND BRAIN OF FATHER OF CYRUS MISTRY MR S. PALLONJI.EVEN AFTER HANDING OVER TO CYRUS MISTRY YOU HAVE KEPT YOUR OWN EXECUTIVES WHO WERE WORKING AS INFORMERS LIKE WHO RENEWED THE LEASE OF TATA STEEL,AB LAL ETC .IN COMING TIME NO YOUNG CEO'S WILL WORK IN TATA GROUPS WHEN YOU IS GIVING DICTATORIAL TERMS ON CYRUS MISTRY WHO IS YOUNG ENOUGH TO BE YOUR SON LIKE.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Discusion Forum
Re: MISTRY REMOVAL WAS NECESSARY TATA'S
by Discusion Forum on Nov 02, 2016 09:15 AM
If a son do something wrong father can rectify him for the welfare of the family. You check what was the turn over of Tata group when Mr. Ratan Tata took over the helm of Tata group and when he left as Chairman of Tata Group(from Rs. 10000 crores it rose to USD 100 billion) that is the proof of his capability.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
dineshhassija
an employer's right..
by dineshhassija on Nov 01, 2016 09:10 PM

No one has a right to question any employer

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ashwin
Tatas & Mistry
by Ashwin on Nov 01, 2016 09:04 PM

TATA group as a whole, in the most respected not only in India but also several Foreign Countries. If it was necessary for Ratan Tata, to change the Guard, well its Tata's internal affair. But the whole world is wondering if it should have been in such a manner? If Cyrus Mistry & Ratan Tata fight it out in the open, it is the TATA Group which will be at a great loss. Rata Tata should have thought of the prestige and reputation of Tata Group as a whole. This is what everyone fels.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 7 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message