What promises? Modi did not make any promise during General Election. What ever he said were just JUMLAS. If people took that as promise then it is mistake of people not Modi's.
In India law governance system created to benefit some person is the result of poor economic. For example people in India have more potential to develop but BJP government always favors some person to create more poor. If people not given opportunity to develop only focus on corporate to punish people of India will never give successes. Development opportunity should be given to whom have potential to develop not only corporate because of politician nexus with Industrialist is the result economic is in bad shape. People in India have more potential for development but not getting proper financial assistance to develop by getting good skill training, management skill to start business, self employment.
Re: rediff we know he cant do any thing.
by paul theo on Jan 17, 2016 09:32 AM
THE MODI GOVT IS A TOTAL FAILURE ON ALL FRONTS, JUST GIVING EMPTY PROMISES CANNOT RUN A COUNTRY LIKE OURS. ALL PEOPLE CANNOT BE FOOLED ALL THE TIME.
Re: Re: rediff we know he cant do any thing.
by gottachange on Jan 17, 2016 07:06 PM
Empty heads like you who have a dislike for modi cannot digest the fact that he is PM. You guys like the corrupt Kongress. Fools cannot be fooled anyway, so dont worry
Re: Re: rediff we know he cant do any thing.
by Ganesan S on Jan 17, 2016 12:38 PM
Fact is, Modi is doing much better than MMS despiet being a non-economist because UPA's intentions were just centred around looting, whereas Modi's intentions are genuine.
Re: Re: Re: rediff we know he cant do any thing.
by Ram kumar on Jan 17, 2016 03:31 PM
This so called loot gave you this position where you all talk about economy.You people still need lessons on Economics learn from Gujjus who flourished in this scenario now advocating the other way means more money
Fulfilling economic promise in campaign not in reality . NPA increased many lakhs of crore now eating people fund saved in bank at risk cheated by corporate need to recover NPA. government will not be allowed to put tax paid hard earn money for NPA to bank.
what we couldnt achieve in 68 years ,how is it possible to achieve in 1 year.a plant cannot produce the fruit in just a year of planting. we all have to work in that direction. critics are also the part of it.
Re: Re: growth
by NG Nileshwar on Jan 10, 2016 05:30 PM
The poverty of 68% below the poverty line even after 68 years is a clear indicator of the statement made. What more proof do u want?
Re: Re: Re: Re: growth
by Ganesan S on Jan 17, 2016 12:41 PM
Compare with South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and China in our neighbourhood, and you'll realize India's progress in 68 years is by default and not by design.
Re: Re: Re: growth
by Che Guevara on Jan 16, 2016 03:43 PM
NG, BJP supporters who minted money during Cong raj of 60 years are to be blamed for the increasing poverty in India.
Beneficiaries of corruption are now talking against corruption by changing the side.
Re: growth
by Rajendra Gupta on Jan 10, 2016 09:35 AM
This is typical excuse of idiots who make false promises to grab power and then want to pas time unable to do anything.
Re: Re: growth
by Swissbanker on Jan 10, 2016 05:39 PM
U r talking about Gandhis whose real surname is not Gandhi but Nehru and changed it to Gandhi to capitalise on GandhiJi's good deeds?
Re: Re: Re: growth
by axxo on Jan 17, 2016 12:54 AM | Hide message
arey they put the gandhi not bcos our baapu. its only bcos of their father feroze gandhi. then they keep it. dont b a fool that name shoulb based on mothers side. u r so pathetic.
Re: Re: growth
by sanjeev rao on Jan 16, 2016 04:09 PM
Pl let us the Knowlede Rahul Gandhi has. Can explain what is GST. Full Form of GST How may countries has GST.If he is really for the Growth of India, He should not disrupt the Parliament rather talk of GST. Mahatma Gandhi gave his life for the Country. What this Dynasty, called themselves as Gandhi, adopted Name really care for the Country. Come open your eyes.
Re: Re: Re: growth
by Ram kumar on Jan 17, 2016 03:29 PM
better ask BJP which refused this bill for 7yrs.Means they new nothing it is only now they have learnt GST in consultation with USA FRance England etc
Re: growth
by paul theo on Jan 10, 2016 09:35 AM
THE BJP GOVT IS A TOTAL FAILURE ON ALL FRONTS, THEY ARE ONLY GOOD IN GIVING LECTURES, AND EMPTY PROMISES, HENCE THEY ARE LOOSING ALL PANCHAYAT ELECTIONS.
Re: Re: growth
by ranaadheera on Jan 10, 2016 09:08 PM
congress has done a commendable job since independence.it was in power for the majority of that period.you can see where India is today,but all the development done by Nehru family is been ruined by mr Modi in the past 19 months.India can only be saved by RAHUL Gandhiji he is the greatest gift by our great roman lady sonia manio.he is the most hard working netha in face of thi planet.Even today he is touring the world promoting india,Modi is just going on a sightseeing tour of the world.RAHUL SORRY JI is aself made hero he is so knowledgeable MODI SORRY CHAIWALA KNOWS nothing.mr theo you are the next greatest person after rahul ji
Re: growth
by Rajendra Gupta on Jan 10, 2016 09:36 AM
What you did not achieve in 68 years you fool? You are writing this chat on rediff because of 68 years development and driving imported looking cars.
Re: Re: growth
by NG Nileshwar on Jan 10, 2016 05:33 PM
Is driving imported cars a sign of development or 68% poverty a line against development? Why do u not like to think of this?
Re: Re: Re: growth
by sanjay sss on Jan 17, 2016 06:17 PM
In 1947,US population was 20 crore and India's 30 Crore.In 2011,US population is 30 crore and India's 120 Crore. If 32% Indians are not poor today,that figure comes to 36 crore,more than the pupolation of US.This is the progress of the last 68 years.
Re: Re: growth
by sanjeev rao on Jan 16, 2016 04:05 PM
You pl go the Growth during the Nehru and Indira Gandhi, when really the economy picked up during the time of Narsimha Rao as PM not Gandhi, ManMohan as PM. pl get the knowledge, The Scam from Nehru to Manmohan, How much Money has been drained out of the Country
Re: Re: growth
by Ganesan S on Jan 17, 2016 05:48 PM
Even people in the poorest of African countries like Somalia and Liberia use internet & chat, and drive imported cars. What do you want to prove with your argument? Some countries progress a little despite their Govts, while some others progress well due to their Govts. We should compare ourselves with South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Japan and China. Have we progressed comparably?
Re: growth
by Rakesh Dandekar on Jan 16, 2016 03:52 PM
Yes correct plant cannot give fruit in one year but this plant was planted 68 years back and many plants are giving fruits now and now want only water and fertilizer instead of taking only fruits that was not planted by us. On what basis govt is announcing one by one yojana and from where they will bring money. Is it not possible to study what plant is giving how much fruits and what is to take necessary steps instead of that go on announcing yojana for poor people. Baby cannot run within one month it take minimum 12 months by that time mother should take care her but baby cannot critize mother. You are right but mine is my own logic whether you believe it or not.
Re: Re: growth
by Ganesan S on Jan 17, 2016 12:45 PM
Compare with South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and China in our neighbourhood, and you'll realize India's progress in 68 years is by default and not by design.
