Discussion Board

Nationalisation of banks a historical economic blunder: Subramanian


Total 67 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
anil kumar joshi
Political mileage
by anil kumar joshi on Jul 21, 2015 04:46 PM

Nationalisation was done looks mainly to enjoy public money by Indian politicians.What UPA Government did by waiving off 60000 Cr loan to farmers and most of the defaulter mainly big -politicians and big farmers got the benefit where as honest farmer who paid on time got nothing.Indian leaders treat Public sector bank and money as theirs .Most of the schemes floated by govt are being misused
Have govt reviewed the BPL names where families Now getting 60000-70000 salary per month are also taking advantage of BPL.time has come to penalise such families by way of jail term.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
amol kolvenker
bank nationalization
by amol kolvenker on Jul 21, 2015 04:41 PM

very true sir,these nationalized banks will be burden on common men in near future.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sheo shukla
Bank nationalization
by sheo shukla on Jul 21, 2015 04:35 PM

Mr. Subramanyam,your assessment is highly incorrect.You appear to be a confused person.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
narayanan subramaniam shankar
Bank Nationalization
by narayanan subramaniam shankar on Jul 21, 2015 04:15 PM  | Hide replies

Bank nationalization was the biggest hoax that the GOI played on the Citizens. Who has benefited? You will find mostly politicians, bureaucrats and Senior officials have benefited by giving huge loans to undeserving businessmen without following prudent norms. A classic case is Indian bank where an ex-Chairman was made the scape goat but the politician involved it was a big gun and the Chairman had to take the rap. recently Kingfisher airlines also is reported to have defaulted on huge loans. The list is endless. The business houses which are having strong and powerful connections at the right places will never get caught. Primarily because it is public money, no one is bothered. All cases of defaults should be put in the public domain. The officials who are responsible for giving huge loans without due diligence should be given exemplary punishment. Then only the names of the politicians and bureaucrats involved to sanction the loan, though there will be no written proof, will come out. But will this ever come out in our country. If a poor workmen steals even Rs. 100/-, he will face dismissal from the job. But no such thing for these powerful people. Can we expect to know the truth in all these defaults. It is very much doubtful. This milking of cash cow will continue.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Amit
Re: Bank Nationalization
by Amit on Jul 21, 2015 04:23 PM
Even without nationalization American banks do the same .....the CEA is clueless loose talker

   Forward   |   Report abuse
nava jee
Not to agree with CEA
by nava jee on Jul 21, 2015 04:07 PM  | Hide replies

Sir, With all respect for your wisdom, I disasgree with your assessment. Only because of nationalisation, banks have come to doorsteps of rural areas, giving services to many, extending loans to priority sector which was not the case. Private sector banks came in only to gather cream created by liberalisation. They dont appear for any government led initiatives.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Kakali Chatterjee
Justify & Opine
by Kakali Chatterjee on Jul 21, 2015 04:03 PM

Being in a position like yours first justify whether the principle was wrong or the implementation & the people implementing it & then comment please.See the benefits that have accrued & would have accrued if the money were not doled out to Tycoons. Please think from the level of a common man using your intellect.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
dhananjay kritu
well Dear Economic experts
by dhananjay kritu on Jul 21, 2015 01:49 PM  | Hide replies

Whole concept of socialism was a blunder. We citizens knew it in 70' & 80's, you know it now

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Muraleedharan  Nair
Bank Nationalization
by Muraleedharan Nair on Jul 21, 2015 01:43 PM

Sorry , the Chief Economic Adviser should have discussed it in an appropriate forum of economists,rather than making public statements.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 67 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message