that is why mumbai, kolkata is not in list. just because per sq feet is more that doesnt mean these are cities. a bottle of water in desert can be sold for 1 million $. that doesnt mean desert is most expensive place....
Re: counting is for cities and not villages
by Indian Public on Jan 14, 2013 05:00 PM
Oh no, why did you show your immense knowledge about place classification (City and Village) here. This forum is not for genuis like you. Don't waste your inputs with small people like us... Please leave us alone!!!
Re: counting is for cities and not villages
by shridharan mayakrishna on Jan 14, 2013 06:22 PM
We have a Genius here... Kindly educate illiterate like us.
Re: Re: counting is for cities and not villages
by shridharan mayakrishna on Jan 14, 2013 06:23 PM
We have a Genius here... Mr.Kumar Kindly educate illiterate like us.
Re: counting is for cities and not villages
by ravi kontham on Jan 29, 2013 06:09 PM
omg...ur a genius! Mumbai is a village? then u must be a gawti! get a life!
Re: Re: counting is for cities and not villages
by Arutirtha on Jan 30, 2013 10:35 AM
yes he is KUMAR..all KUMAR and KUMARIS are from B H R.. please dont vomit here and there KUMAR ...the villages u mentioned are the metros and UFFFF--nothing to say.....
6 years ago our honorable prime minister has declared that we will make mumbai next shangai...after that he disappeared....with recent killings of our soldiers by pakistan and recent gang rape his silence was the most pathetic and deplorable ever done by a prime minister...he should hang his head in shame and run away....by the way it seems he is already lost his mind and is in his own world...
Re: where is our PM
by Indian Public on Jan 14, 2013 03:24 PM
Well, you started in right direction but then you got pulled away in a different direction. We shall discuss about congestion here, everyone knows about our PM and politicians. No point in wasting time in describing them here :(.
Re: Wrong information
by Tanveer Inamdar on Jan 14, 2013 03:21 PM
It's mismanagement that's cause for congestion in cities you have mentioned, rather than people/sqm.
Re: mumbai
by Indian Indian on Jan 14, 2013 02:42 PM
pls break the record of inch/second of Bangalore first ;-). Mumbai can still be considered as meter/second ;-)
Re: Re: mumbai
by Indian Public on Jan 14, 2013 03:17 PM
Sorry Indian Indian, here they are talking in terms of population and not traffic :). When it is about traffic then you can take the trophy!!!
Re: Bangalore ??
by Indian Public on Jan 14, 2013 03:19 PM
B'glore is winning the race for slowest traffic movement, unfortunately this is about congestion due to population and not traffic :-)...
Re: How
by Indian Public on Jan 14, 2013 02:44 PM
When did Patna became congested, you nuts. Don't bark on Bihar in everything. Everybody is surprised how come Mumbai is not in list and you are crying of something else!!!
