now mamata is going after kunal ghosh and srinjoy bose as the fall guys.. but they are small fry! they are nobodies..kunal ghosh's claim to fame is as a cchhchamcha editor of TMC and Mamata.. he used the newspaper pratidin ( owned by srinjoy bose) to spread lies in favour of TMC and against the left frnt..srinjoy supported that.. so kunal was rewarded by making him the group media CEO of mamata's mouthpieces,,TARA channel, saradha's bengali newspapers and channel 10..srinjoy's family was rewarded by booting out their business rivals ABG group from haldia.. these 2 became collectors for mamata.. they collected the loot for mamata from saradha...the other indirect route for collecting loooot was to sell mamata's so called paintings to bsuinessmen for crores.. so the owner of saradha had to buy one such trash painting for almost 2 crores ! first arrest mamata and investigate the loooot route.. b4 touching the small fry !
Re: Sahara is a big Ponzi Co.
by Jalal on Apr 23, 2013 09:17 PM
definitely some of them are caring that's why no action is being taken. It is much beneficial for them to take no action than taking action!!
SEBI who are after Sahara Group so heavily, could not care about small investors in Bengal. SEBI chief should be held responsible. Collective fund collection comes under SEBI's jurisdiction. SEBI chief should resign immediately.It is not only bengal, Esatern Assam ( Dhubri) etc are heavily affected. But I guess Sharda group has heavily invested the collected money in Land. so there is small hope
Re: SEBI is reponsible for this mess
by VajpayeeKaulsex on Apr 23, 2013 08:11 PM
mamta bannerjee and kunal ghosh are responsible for chit fund scam in w bengal
Re: SEBI is reponsible for this mess
by Balan Iyer on Apr 23, 2013 08:13 PM
You think SEBI is responsible; but it is not;on the contrary the dumb population and the crooked operators of CHEAT FUND are responsible.
The observation of Sri Sarkar is far from correct. So far my knowledge goes the investment in small savings in 2011-12 was around 12000 crore against 2012-13 figure of 120 crore. Moreover, LF ministers kept safe distance from chitfundwalas whereas TMC ministers from 2009 onwards acted otherwise, left made the bill in2003 again resubmitted on 2009 which was not pursued by present Govt for obvious reasons. Sri Sarkar having TMC leaning distorted the fact.
The observation of Mr. Abhirup Sarkar is not correct. Sofar my knowledge goes in FY 2011-12 the small savings was around 12000 Crore against FY 2012-13 of Rs120 Crore. Regarding other observation I like to say LF ministers kept safe distance from chitfund walas whereas TMC ministers acted completely reverse manner. Moreover, Sri sarkar being TMC leaning expressed such distorted observation,
