Re: Why CAG uncomfortable
by Karan Hi on Jan 21, 2011 01:26 PM
Hey South Indian why do u folks believe in Hero worship ! He is just fooling you.. my dear,
Re: Why CAG uncomfortable
by apurva singh on Jan 21, 2011 02:47 PM
southie, stop this slave worship. you people are also known to have mandirs of your movie stars. ridiculous. get a mind of your own and throw this corrupt nehru_gandhi family into the indian ocean.
It is really disgusting that the PM is unable to control his Ministers. they all seeem to be pleaseing Sonia ghandi, rather than performing their duty. It is high time that the PM should bring out all facts before the nation or resign if he cannot govern.
Re: Shame on PM
by Suresh P on Jan 21, 2011 01:33 PM
And what is PM doing, the same thing, Pleasing SOnia. Are there any evidence that this highly regarded man has done anything worthy of being called a good PM.
He needs big stick on his back..Always comes out with senseless and idiotic statements..Maybe a good lawyer but a very poor speaker...He has also made confusion of nursery admission age by giving statement that it will be 4 ...till date the confusion is till on
Such a resonsible person should not have talked like that. He is defending to some one particularly for congress party. It is very shameful for congress having such a minister.
Minister should avoid such statements though these loss of revenue figures to Govt exchequer are notional which has no meaning. The fact of the matter is we have digraced from the point of corruption to loss to Govt. We must find who got benefitted, why and how. Earlier minister must of twisted rule to benefits some. That should be found out.
Re: CAG
by Kill on Jan 21, 2011 01:24 PM
Ratan tata is a senile spent force. he has no locus standi on telecome policies. there was no loss in 1999 u f00l, 'cos there was no spectrum before 1999.
Re: CAG
by Prakash Chandra on Jan 21, 2011 01:24 PM
Same CAG has said that they have already checked it and there was no loss except the money south indian has teken by corrupt mean.
Mr Sibal u should now resign imdtly if you are still left with some moral values or Indian public will throw you and your party out in a few days anyway.
After some time "Yuvraj Rahul" will make following statements. Its not true that 176000 Crore loss at Telecom Scam. Its not true that 1000 crore loss at CWG. Its not true that Kasab killed our persons in Mumbai on 26.11. Its not true that Adarsh Scam happened cause of Politicians. Its not true that Afzal Guru was behind the Parliament Attack. Bloddy he and his congress criticising about the non cooperation from state govt. at Varanasi Bomb blast and Inflation towards the coaliation govt. and still we are quiet. Thats why Jai Ho Congress.
Re: Jai Ho Congress
by Thomas Philip on Jan 21, 2011 01:29 PM
The SC can get away saying anything.They even in the judgment in Staines murder case said that it was not the rarest of rare to deserve death penalty.So a pre-meditated and planned murder of innocent children and a person working among lepers was not something rarest of rare.The infallibility of the SC!!
Re: Re: Jai Ho Congress
by Kill on Jan 21, 2011 01:40 PM
fatty, do u even know the topics while u write ur senseless remarks? have some kindness on us mortals , we can't just keep on bearing ur utterly confused state of mindless remarks.
Re: Re: Jai Ho Congress
by guy giggling on Jan 21, 2011 01:34 PM
Working among the lepers and harvesting souls as usual. Fishing in troubled waters. I do not condone the murders. Dara Singh must pay for what he did. But you - obviously with your religious inclinations - are not the suited to quantify the punishment. The SC is better learned and THE authority.
Re: Jai Ho Congress
by guy giggling on Jan 21, 2011 01:31 PM
rahul baba would (a bit forgetfully) start with "If my father or my grandfather were alive, none of this would have happened". His chamchas would be furiously whispering to him "Baba, baba please control, it's your mother at the helm ". Rahul would try to shake his drunken stupor (he's hit the bottle since the Bihar debacle). He'll then recall that he's not talking about the m_a_s_j_i_d judgement.
