Re: Montek deserves to be the Railways Minister.
by dipak kalita on Jul 20, 2010 01:22 PM
both drivers may have got a job in Quota. Inefficiency in selection in critical posts.
Re: Montek deserves to be the Railways Minister.
by Ram R on Jul 21, 2010 10:55 AM
High officials (other than Quota group) should make sure 2 guys both from quota should not be on same job. because if there is a non quota guy, at least he will work responsbily and avoid disaster. But when both are QUOTA master (courtesy Congress) then even GOD can not help. Both with many more will go straight to H....L.
Re: crony directorship
by p kumar on Jul 20, 2010 01:24 PM
first of all, let us realise that there is no actual need for any railway corridor in this country to transport raw material. we should look at setting up industries near the raw material sources. for example, the state can set up a steel plant near bellary, with the world bank assistance, if funds are required, due to abundant availability of iron ore. railway freight corridor at best should be used to provide last mile connectivity from the port to industry, either to bring in raw material from oversees or to take finished goods from factories to ports. it is foolish to transport raw material within the country. and for all this, the ticket paying common passenger is financing the entire tamasha!
Re: Re: crony directorship
by Sandeep Mukherjee on Jul 20, 2010 01:38 PM
but the moment u try to put up industries near the raw material sites there will be screams about land alienation, displacement etc etc.. maoists will go on killing sprees, med*a pa*k*r will orchestrate sob stories, ma*ta will yell ma-mati-manush.. intellectuals will act as if the world is coming to an end! so what do u do? let these jok*rs prevail and let india sigh and languish!
Re: Re:
by p kumar on Jul 20, 2010 01:20 PM
mamata, who is great for throwing out tata motors from singur,, will now sing a different song. in any other country, a person who has opposed setting up a huge industry, will never be made a union minister. it is misfortune of india that we have joker women leading us from the front, all the way to accidents!
Re: Re:
by Shankar Ganguly on Jul 20, 2010 01:50 PM
Do u really belief that Tata could have change the fate of bengal? If so, what about Kharagpur. Why not kharagpur became industrial hub where few Tata units exist. Tata confirmed that they produce 100000 Nano from singur & for that bengal govt had to sacrifice State VAT @ 12.5% of car price, ie, 12500/- on each car, means 1250000000/- per year, plus cost of very fertile land, plus cost of 3 years agricultural production of that area, plus diminishing production of surrunding area due to pollution etc, after that u can calculate the development in terms of money. If TATA was so interested to establish plant in west bengal, then why not Purulia, Bankura, those places are very neat to TATANAGAR. Dear, pl think positively. These are all gimmick of CPM,the party fail to improve bit but pull down the briliant state to hell.
The coalition politics in India is deemed to languish like this, with no body having any national outlook or welfare in sight. Yesterday's Congress regime encouraged illegal mining in Karnataka for the sake of party funds, now they oppose it. How they(illegai miners) are destroying roads ans causing serious health problems to AP districts in the road route is because of freebies in 100s of crores, to their relatives in Andhra. God save this wretcheds' country.
Re: INDIAN RAILWAYS
by p kumar on Jul 20, 2010 01:19 PM
while in power, congress granted mining leases to all and sundry without any financial gain to the state exchequer. now, this ore travels by road all the way from bellary to krishnapatnam port in nellore, and one can see the entire road along the length has already turned red with ore dust settling down on road. now congressmen will invest in hospitals, since the entire population will be ill due to pollution of these fellows. today the same congress is opposing the mining leases, without naming anybody!
