Discussion Board

6 phrases that you've been using incorrectly


Total 34 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2
CAxPert
1more
by CAxPert on Jan 02, 2015 12:09 AM  | Hide replies

I didn’t do nothing

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Shownak
Re: 1more
by Shownak on Jan 02, 2015 01:12 PM
"I didn't do nothing is a typical American usage. Few other examples: "You are kidding me!" "I am mad at you" (= "I am angry at you"), etc.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aus ant
Another
by aus ant on Jan 01, 2015 05:08 PM  | Hide replies

Another phrase commonly used by hindiwallas is 'take his name'.
Doesn't make sense.
How can u take someone's name!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
pat thakur
Re: Another
by pat thakur on Jan 01, 2015 05:13 PM
Take someone, then; as simple as that.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Amitabh
There are others too
by Amitabh on Jan 01, 2015 04:45 PM  | Hide replies

There are many other phrases which are used incorrectly. Neck to neck is one such case. Neck and neck is the right phrase.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
raghu rao
Re: There are others too
by raghu rao on Jan 01, 2015 05:23 PM
another example is 'max to max'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Tanzeel
good one
by Tanzeel on Jan 01, 2015 12:49 PM

indeed informative!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vishal jain
liked it
by vishal jain on Jan 01, 2015 11:15 AM

Please regularly post such informative articles.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
krishna kumar
phrases
by krishna kumar on Dec 31, 2014 10:12 PM

Blunder mistake, is another phrase which makes lttle sense

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Thomas Chacko
On correctness and incorrectness
by Thomas Chacko on Dec 31, 2014 04:23 PM  | Hide replies

It is common for languages to have some redundancies at all levels, orthographic, phonological syntactic, and lexical. The geminate letters in English -- such as the two 'm's in the word "immanent" are unnecessary, but we happily use them. The expression "safe haven" is an example of lexical redundancy, that is all. Since it follows the Adjective Noun rule of english noun phrases, it cannot be considered incorrect or meaningless. Redundant, may be, but not ungrammatical.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
aus ant
Re: On correctness and incorrectness
by aus ant on Jan 01, 2015 05:10 PM
Thomas, can you please translate what you wrote.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
aus ant
Re: On correctness and incorrectness
by aus ant on Jan 01, 2015 05:32 PM
Thomas, what you wrote may neither be 'redundant' nor 'ungrammatical', but it certainly is unintelligible!
Since this article is about the use of phrases that doesn't make sense, were you, by any chance, giving us a combination of phrases that doesn't make sense!


   Forward   |   Report abuse
aus ant
Re: On correctness and incorrectness
by aus ant on Jan 01, 2015 05:43 PM
Thomas, do u run a business...a book store, perhaps.
Do you sell dictionary.

Are you forcing us to buy dictionaries.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ramkishore S
Re: On correctness and incorrectness
by Ramkishore S on Jan 01, 2015 11:47 AM
It is 'imminent'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
giveanid
I hope you'll write about cringeworthy cliches Indians use
by giveanid on Dec 31, 2014 10:14 AM  | Hide replies

I blame Ravi Shastri, to a large extent!

Glad that these articles from you address a lot of problems of Indian English. If everyone reads these articles, our English won't be an object of ridicule to others.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
kapil
Re: I hope you'll write about cringeworthy cliches Indians use
by kapil on Dec 31, 2014 11:22 AM
it seems you think good english means the end of the world?? Japnies and germans still dont accept english.. dont you know???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Pat Thakur
Re: Re: I hope you'll write about cringeworthy cliches Indians us
by Pat Thakur on Dec 31, 2014 06:41 PM
& yankees have raped it to suit their own whims n fancies.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
giveanid
Re: Re: I hope you'll write about cringeworthy cliches Indians us
by giveanid on Dec 31, 2014 09:38 PM
This article is for people who like English and want to be good in English. You can learn Japanese or German or Sanskrit.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piri
Re: Re: I hope you'll write about cringeworthy cliches Indians us
by piri on Jan 01, 2015 09:17 AM
The Japanese and Germans may still have not allowed English to displace their languages fully, true (though they do offer full fledged courses now in various streams at their universities entirely in the English medium in order to attract international students).

But this fact does not help the vast multitudes of Indian middle class commoners (especially north Indian middle class commoners) who yearn in private and yearn in vain that their English could somehow be improved, does it ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Cynic
famous and well-known
by Cynic on Dec 31, 2014 10:11 AM  | Hide replies

1. This is a nice series and must continue. Learning correct language is important.

2. If "Old adage" is incorrect (or superfluous), so should be "famous adage" too as "...well-known..." (meaning famous) is a also a part of the given definition like "Old..."

    Forward  |  Report abuse
giveanid
Re: famous and well-known
by giveanid on Dec 31, 2014 10:18 AM
I too disagree with the article that old adage and safe haven are wrong. Same with ATM machines, NDA agreements... although they are technically incorrect, its common usage.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
palanki narayana
tautology
by palanki narayana on Dec 31, 2014 10:10 AM  | Hide replies

"For all intents and purposes" is an example of tautology (saying the same thing twice, using different words). Lawyers are particularly fond of such expressions (null and void, between and betwixt).

    Forward  |  Report abuse
giveanid
Re: tautology
by giveanid on Dec 31, 2014 10:16 AM
Exactly. I am often gobsmacked by the License Agreements 'by and on behalf of, of which and not only which but where, intended told, not told or otherwise implied yadayada'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 34 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2
Write a message