Re: mahabharata
by side arm on Oct 21, 2012 12:26 PM
even in ancient times, the populace never trusted bhramins. so they had to rent valmiki (an untouchable) to narrate the ramayan. Why have people of this age started trusting these liers
Apreciable as closing page on special issue of KALYAN [geeta-press,Gorakhpur]on Bhawat-Geta,tried to touch the issue with Parikshit coming to throne succeeded by his son Janmejay,who listens the entire story of Mahabharat,as passed on to us. Dialectic pattern is interesting and the way ,the olden subject is produced in interesting manner deserves applause !
Do not agree with the writer, we know world history from the last 5000 years, similarly we have fairly very good glimse of stone age, which may not be more than 15000-20000 years old. If Krishna was there during this time, his CHARISHMA do not match with history. Only one aspect can be there, that HE came on earth few lacs years back, and total civilisation of that time is vanished with the passage of time. Even for that no fossil or proof is there.
Re: Krishna time
by gali on Oct 21, 2012 12:04 PM
stop talking like a moron.Krishna existed and it could be found in the ruins of dwaraka.You have no right to hurt someone's religious sentiments this way.
Re: Re: krishna
by OMPI on Oct 21, 2012 11:40 AM
Same thing. Now 2000 plus 3000 BC that is 5000 years only. I don't understand who is this Keralaman. What is he doing here. Thinking he is intelligent to others?
Re: Re: krishna
by LAKSHMINARAYANAN narayanan on Oct 17, 2012 03:42 PM
Ignorance is bliss. You are a frog in the well.It is a pity that people like you are existing today, without knowing what is what?
Re: Re: Re: krishna
by gali on Oct 21, 2012 12:10 PM
what is the topic and what is everyone discussing about.It is about a book and foolish morons cannot stop but bringing religion into everything.India is such a hopeless country and Indians are the worst race on planet.Atleast for a few minutes can we concentrate on the actual topic and not on non trivial stuff?
