Discussion Board

IN PICS: The indomitable Daulatabad Fort of Aurangabad


Total 34 messages Pages | 1
Prabhakar Waghodekar
IN PICS: The indomitable Daulatabad Fort of Aurangabad
by Prabhakar Waghodekar on Jan 31, 2015 10:22 PM

It would have been more interesting if some data regarding its construction year and some other features would have been included. More coverage is given to the things other than the fort proper. Deogiri fort was nonconqurable, one can enter from north to south only after conquering the fort. The water harvesting technique is idegenious, the location and construction is unparallel.Is it right to state "Daualatabad fort of Aurangabad"? In fact, Aurangzeb stayed in Aurangabad (Khadaki) more than 2 decades fighting with marathas who died in Aurangabad, far away from Delhi/Agra, and his kabar is in Kulatabad, 7-8 km from Daulatabad. Deogiri fort is about 15 km from Aurangabad, located in a village called Daulatabad, a railway station on Kacheduda-Manamad route. Allaudin Khilaji captered the fort in the 13th century, for someforce personnel from Yadavas betrayed. Ekanath and Janardan Swami stayed in the fort. It is surprising to note that at the top of fort water is available. The fort has a strategic location in the hilly area. The historical monuments that are amazing in terms of say science, technology, eco-system need more meticuous attention to preserve them. Are we failing

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Atul Pradhan
Devgiri
by Atul Pradhan on Nov 10, 2012 08:43 AM

The Fort Name was Devgiri & its history go beyond Muslim rulers of 14 century

    Forward  |  Report abuse
B M
Pitiful condition
by B M on Nov 09, 2012 08:07 AM  | Hide replies

I had visited the fort some 30 years ago as a school boy. The fort was designed with a terrific defence system!

So sorry to see the fort in such a pitiful condition. No effort to conserve our heritage!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Nirdesh Singh
Re: Pitiful condition
by Nirdesh Singh on Nov 09, 2012 09:18 AM
Hi BM,

I share your concern. Yes the fort is in sorry condition. Maharashtra ASI need to learn from Karnataka ASI where heritage structures are much better maintained.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Optimus
Re: Re: Pitiful condition
by Optimus on Nov 11, 2012 06:05 PM
Forget maintenance, our politicians are more concentrating on filling their pockets from foreign tourists than maintaining the structures. Today or tomorrow these structure will be diminished and land will sold to builders to constructs buildings.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rustam shaikh
Re: Re: Re: Pitiful condition
by rustam shaikh on Nov 14, 2012 10:13 PM
I fully agree. We have the worst kind of politicians in the world.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jignesh narayan parmar
Re: Re: Re: Re: Pitiful condition
by jignesh narayan parmar on Jan 31, 2015 10:30 AM
As are the people so will be the politicians and the govt-- even the common man is a culprit .

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SarvamKrishnarpanam
City of Djins
by SarvamKrishnarpanam on Nov 08, 2012 08:14 PM  | Hide replies

Just recently read City of Dijns and Willam Dalrymple had beautifully written about it and good to see them in pictures.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Nirdesh Singh
Re: City of Djins
by Nirdesh Singh on Nov 09, 2012 09:20 AM
Hi Sarvam,

I have not read City of Djinns yet. Will definitely read it now.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Abhijeet Salokhe
Devgiri fort (& not Daulatabad fort)
by Abhijeet Salokhe on Nov 08, 2012 08:11 PM  | Hide replies

Original name of this fort is Devgiri when built by Yadavs !!! (Why we are using name kept by foreign rulers?)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Nirdesh Singh
Re: Devgiri fort (& not Daulatabad fort)
by Nirdesh Singh on Nov 09, 2012 09:32 AM
Hi Abhijeet,

You are right. Devgiri was the capital of Yadavas and the original name of the fort. Name changing of cities and locations continues even today.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jameel hasan
indian history
by jameel hasan on Nov 07, 2012 10:31 PM  | Hide replies

very well written. Now is the time to safe as much as possible. Never to think to whom it belongs, now it is Indian history and culture. It feels really disgusting to see how we treat our own history by neglecting it. The most sorry state is the person who built Hyderabad city, his mosolium is used as toilet

    Forward  |  Report abuse
deepak
Re: indian history
by deepak on Nov 08, 2012 08:35 PM
why did not anyone save the Hindu civilization from what is now Pakistan??? it has been wiped out with only 2% remaining. There is NOT even one newspaper in the Devanagri script and not even ONE Pakistani university offer a course in Indology or Sanskrit or Vedic religions/philosophy. why is a mad guy like Tughlak so important??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Champak
Re: Re: indian history
by Champak on Nov 11, 2012 06:26 PM
deepakso, what you donot want to safeguard the musliim monuments and claim you are a h11ndu.INDIA gained importance because of its equal to all faiths and now you want to follow pakis path so india will have to disintegrate and be like pakistan-get ready for it. H11NDUTVA will make INDIA like a failed state pakistan.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Nirdesh Singh
Re: indian history
by Nirdesh Singh on Nov 08, 2012 09:30 AM
Thanks, Jameel. Yes we need to take care of our heritage. Are you referring to Qutab Shahi Tombs of Hyderabad? I have heard that they have recently spruced up

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Simar Preet Singh
WELL DONE
by Simar Preet Singh on Nov 07, 2012 09:37 PM  | Hide replies

Its beautifully written,The writer churns very well the past and present chronicles to make a perfect blend,
More important to understand the DELHI influence even in Historic days
For INDIA and Indians there can never be or ever be a city who have so much of influence as DELHI has

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Nirdesh Singh
Re: WELL DONE
by Nirdesh Singh on Nov 07, 2012 09:51 PM
Thanks Simar for articulating that beautifully!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
deepak
Re: Re: WELL DONE
by deepak on Nov 08, 2012 08:36 PM
why did not anyone save the Hindu civilization from what is now Pakistan??? it has been wiped out with only 2% remaining. There is NOT even one newspaper in the Devanagri script and not even ONE Pakistani university offer a course in Indology or Sanskrit or Vedic religions/philosophy. why is a mad guy like Tughlak so important??



   Forward   |   Report abuse
systems technologies
Dev-giri
by systems technologies on Nov 07, 2012 09:12 PM  | Hide replies

The fort was capital of Yadavas before muslim invasion. It was rightly called as "Dev-giri" meaning the fort of gods.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Santa
Re: Dev-giri
by Santa on Nov 07, 2012 09:16 PM
Giri means hill and not fort :-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Nirdesh Singh
Re: Re: Dev-giri
by Nirdesh Singh on Nov 08, 2012 09:32 AM
Initially, during the times of Yadavas it was hill with tunnels bored into the hill. The walls, fort and other paraphernalia was added during the times of Tughlaq, Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
deepak
Re: Re: Re: Dev-giri
by deepak on Nov 08, 2012 08:36 PM
why did not anyone save the Hindu civilization from what is now Pakistan??? it has been wiped out with only 2% remaining. There is NOT even one newspaper in the Devanagri script and not even ONE Pakistani university offer a course in Indology or Sanskrit or Vedic religions/philosophy. why is a mad guy like Tughlak so important??



   Forward   |   Report abuse
ulludapattha
Re: Re: Re: Dev-giri
by ulludapattha on Nov 09, 2012 08:28 AM
What a mindless depiction of fort by Nirdesh. The author has no sense of fort architecture. You idiot, I am from Aurangabad and this fort was built by Yadavas along wit the famous Bhulbhulaiyya. Nirdesh will delete the comment.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Total 34 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message