No company is bad, no company is good. No company sucks, no company is awesome. It mostly depends on your manager, team and/or department. ICICI has good departments and bad ones. So does Google. One person's or even a handful of persons' experience doesn't show how a company is. And, for those who think this lady isn't worth becoming a CEO, any one of you really in a position to comment so? Seems I am the dumbest to even try and convince you guys. Get real guys, luck and contacts 'might' get you to the top but it won't keep you there for long. You need to have some skills.
When you stop thinking - only when you are extremely successful. From my experience one must change jobs atleast first 10-15 years spending not more than 3 years in any job. first you do not learn much about different cultures of work or styles of work .You become a cacoon .How many say - performance always gives rewards .In a country if you are in any government organisation - an idiot can get promoted over you on caste basis or reservation .In private they want yes men for promotions and intellectuals to slog it out. Then we have any number caste creed sect etc to discriminate . A nation with emphasis on medicoracy how can merit count? Remember org.Sructures are Pyramid in structures - so if you find you have little chance in the environment which is more often than not change for greener pastures.It is said "it is more important whom you know than hat you know ,hard work is a great asset it fetches harder work " I have not seen one organisation with decent workable Performance Appraisal system .One question - Who keeps a written record of achievements of sub ordinate as a system ? It is just form filling for many - Do change job once you learnt enough move for better responsibilies ,better rewards and alround experience - only fools will reward years wise reward contribution our system is loaded with all negatives . Ikeep advising people to change jobs to learn rather than toe line for promotions .In India people grow not one but five levels above their level o
When you stop thinking - only when you are extremely successful. From my experience one must change jobs atleast first 10-15 years spending not more than 3 years in any job. first you do not learn much about different cultures of work or styles of work .You become a cacoon .How many say - performance always gives rewards .In a country if you are in any government organisation - an idiot can get promoted over you on caste basis or reservation .In private they want yes men for promotions and intellectuals to slog it out. Then we have any number caste creed sect etc to discriminate . A nation with emphasis on medicoracy how can merit count? Remember org.Sructures are Pyramid in structures - so if you find you have little chance in the environment which is more often than not change for greener pastures.It is said "it is more important whom you know than hat you know ,hard work is a great asset it fetches harder work " I have not seen one organisation with decent workable Performance Appraisal system .One question - Who keeps a written record of achievements of sub ordinate as a system ? It is just form filling for many - Do change job once you learnt enough move for better responsibilies ,better rewards and alround experience - only fools will reward years wise reward contribution our system is loaded with all negatives . Ikeep advising people to change jobs to learn rather than toe line for promotions .In India people grow not one but five levels above their level of
Dear Kochhar, I am an EX employ of ICICI BANK LTD, I am even proud to say that because the kind of exposure i got, but same time i donot agree on your point changing job is fashionable, i worked for 3 years and performed extremely well, but not well to according to your rating standard is only a number given according to you attitudes of a person not for the work we have done the same story repeats years on years , and no body can assure in the organization that i can promt you or hike you salary if you perfrom well, hike and promotions are given depending on the Institute you study, and if its worng or right if you don\'t follow your bosses you will struggle for year together, the much shocking to me was when they said though i am PG from an recognized universality i am considered a graduate and so ..on my mail id is rai_prashanth@rediffmail.com
My friend is working in ICICI from past 6yrs... when he started his salary was 9000 pm and after 6 yrs it is 13000 pm.... while in other banks or companies it will ATLEAST double... shame on ur bank
My friend is working in ICICI from past 6yrs... when he started his salary was 9000 pm and after 6 yrs it is 13000 pm.... while in other banks or companies it will ATLEAST double... shame on ur bank
Re: Good
by prem k on Jan 12, 2012 10:39 PM
doesn't say much. in all probability, your friend must be really dumb. if icici does not hike his salary, why does he not meet his manager with another offer paying him much more. at this level, most employers will hike the salary if the person is really deserving.
Re: Re: Good
by rexberry on Jan 13, 2012 11:00 AM
The point here is ... he is not an out going guy like updating his resume every three months and spending half of his day in naukri monster etc... Nor someone who is good in keeping his boss happy... he is very good in complete his assignments and doing his work as delegated to him... but then ICICI like other companies never consider people who are loyal to there companies... tell this chanda ... it is not fashionable but it is need of the hour that people change there jobs every 3 years as they realise there fate in that company
Re: Re: Re: Good
by subra on Jan 15, 2012 07:32 PM
Both the employer and employee have a right to chane and change is mutually beneficial.so quit before they ask u to Anyway ICICI has questionable reputation with customer as well as employees.they are in limelight of media due to their huge ad spend Watch amitab Bachman trying to sell a policy to a security while he is on duty.that reflects the attitude of the bank This bank has potential to collapse
