Discussion Board

From commoners to queens: Duchess Catherine vs Queen of Bhutan!

Total 14 messages Pages | 1
by Gyaan on Oct 31, 2011 09:39 AM

Look all the photos...Queen of Bhutan doesnt look happy with marriage...perhaps she did not like King...10 years gap is quit big....she should have married some one young

    Forward  |  Report abuse
palanki narayana
Commoner and royalty
by palanki narayana on Oct 22, 2011 05:45 PM  | Hide replies

The obsession of royal families with marrying within royalty has led to inbreeding and perpetuation of genetic diseases.The health history of descendants of Queen Victoria provides ample examples.The royal marriages of Pharoahs were incestuous.Aristocrats are known as 'blue blooded' because the blood lacks sufficient haemoglobin, a sign of weakness caused by royalty marrying royalty,often a blood relative.It is a good sign that royals are marrying commoners thus strengthening 'hybrid vigour' instead of looking for spouses from a restricted circle of the "divinely ordained".

    Forward  |  Report abuse
gaius octavian
Re: Commoner and royalty
by gaius octavian on Oct 22, 2011 05:54 PM
its not becaus eof heamoglobin , its because they were too pale without working a day in their lives and their veins which look blue for everyone stood out clearly.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bhutan princess
by Haatim on Oct 18, 2011 02:08 PM  | Hide replies

is very pretty and Bhutan prince also is more handsome than Prince William.

This shows Asians are good looking compared to western society

    Forward  |  Report abuse
george thomas
Re: bhutan princess
by george thomas on Oct 19, 2011 07:58 AM
Jetsun is a Queen ...
not a princess ! ! !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
khawl hring sapa
Bhutan Queen
by khawl hring sapa on Oct 18, 2011 12:08 PM  | Hide replies

Bhutan Queen is prettier than the future Queen of England :)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sheetal Kaur
Re: Bhutan Queen
by Sheetal Kaur on Oct 19, 2011 11:06 PM
If she reaches the throne She will not be a queen,According to British laws a commoner can not become a queen, She will be called Princess consort.
A commoner can not become a King or a queen that is why queens husband Philips is called Prince and not a King.
Although he has some royal blood but he is still considered a commoner, he is a foreigner, a Greek Cypriot.
There fore he is not a true British.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
gaius octavian
Re: Re: Bhutan Queen
by gaius octavian on Oct 22, 2011 12:56 PM
prince philip is a royal of greece, he is called prince because the lineage of uk is female and king is supposed to be greater than queen.so instead of king he is called prince consort.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
John Janardan
Re: Re: Re: Bhutan Queen
by John Janardan on Oct 22, 2011 05:52 PM
who cares anyways? they're all at the mercy of the banking and finance institutions that control the world including the US govmt.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
palanki narayana
Re: Re: Re: Bhutan Queen
by palanki narayana on Oct 22, 2011 05:57 PM
The lineage is not female.The eldest child becomes the heir to the throne.There is a well defined "waiting list" depending upon the degree of kinship.When Edward married a commoner George VI became the king emperor.Commoners Tony Armstrong and Mark Philip married Royal Princesses and would have remained Prince Consorts had either of the princesses ascended the throne.The possibility did not arise as both marriages ended in divorce.It is any body's guess when Prince Charles would be crowned.It is only certain that on that happy occassion he will have to be rolled to the throne in a wheel chair,assuming that the royalty is not abolished by then!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
gaius octavian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bhutan Queen
by gaius octavian on Oct 22, 2011 06:51 PM
it is female in this generation viz. Elizabeth,when Charles becomes king Camilla will be called a queen consort and will be crowned as a queen even if she is a semi commoner.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
gaius octavian
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bhutan Queen
by gaius octavian on Oct 22, 2011 06:53 PM
and Edward did not lose the kingship because he married a commoner, he abdicated the throne because, the parliament was not in favor of him marrying an american divorcee

Forward   |   Report abuse
kala prathap
by kala prathap on Oct 17, 2011 09:18 PM  | Hide replies

It is foolish to say queen of Bhutan is a commoner. She staudied in lawrence school and degree In Englan. How many commoner can have this prevelege

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re: foolish
by V SR on Oct 17, 2011 09:39 PM
The word commoner is different for the purpose. In this case, it only means that she is not from Royal family. Commoner doesnt mean that the person is poor. Commoner, civilian are relative terms.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 14 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message