Discussion Board View article

Total 314 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Sameer Bhagwat
To avoid
by Sameer Bhagwat on May 30, 2010 11:43 PM  | Hide replies

To avoid caste as being suggested by the Brahmins , Brahmins girs should be made to marry Dalit boys only .

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hari N
Re: To avoid
by Hari N on May 31, 2010 11:02 AM
And whom will brahmin boys marry?? Idiot!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rohit Swarnkar
'My caste is 'Indian''
by Rohit Swarnkar on May 30, 2010 08:07 PM  | Hide replies

I belongs to OBC but I donot want to take benefit of any reservation and I donot want to cotinue cast based surname. It sould be stopped immediately. I am AN INDIAN and cast based social system must be removed by any means.Govt should discourage the cast system.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Victor Johri
Re: 'My caste is 'Indian''
by Victor Johri on May 30, 2010 08:42 PM
Dear Rohit, your title says that you belong to OBC. I congratulate you for the reason that you are able to come out of the caste syndrome. Many enlightened OBCs are coming out of caste syndrome, that is a very good sign. Let all enligned people like you specially those belonging to high castes do the same.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hedonist
Why do we have religion and gender based census?
by Hedonist on May 30, 2010 08:02 PM  | Hide replies

Why do we have religion and gender based census?
Why rediffwalas oppose only caste based census why dont they oppose religion and gender based census?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
bak bak
Re: Why do we have religion and gender based census?
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 08:05 PM
because rediff believes in true secularism!!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Oriya Tiger
My Caste is Oriya
by Oriya Tiger on May 30, 2010 07:56 PM

I learned it from my southie friends!!!.

My caste is Oriya. Period.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Aruna Gaitonde
Too long...
by Aruna Gaitonde on May 30, 2010 07:53 PM  | Hide replies


To begin with the constitution should be amended and 'reservation' for certain caste/class be discontinued. After so many years, isn't it time every Indian is offered the same opportunity ? For the better development of the society and country on the whole, the sooner done the better.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Praveen Goud
Re: Too long...
by Praveen Goud on May 30, 2010 08:10 PM
Constitution tried to provide reservation for oppressed castes and socially discarded for better empowerment. That was agreed.

Unfortunately, most of the SC/ST jobs and reservations are taken by non-SC/ST castes with bogus caste certificates to the extent of entering parliament too.

If our governance had implemented reservation properly after independece, by this time we would have annuled reservation.

Unless, cent percent literacy rate , prevention of nepotism and favourtism with equal opportunites and social justice , no one can pluck or dare to remove reservation.

Reservations were misued and not properly implemented. This forced the extension of reservation period.

We need a system and governance which provides equal opportunities , accountable governance with quality and compulsory education to annul the reservation.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hedonist
Re: Too long...
by Hedonist on May 30, 2010 07:59 PM
How can 63 years close the disparity between forward and backward of 6 billlion years

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bak bak
Re: Re: Too long...
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 08:03 PM
when u close ur illiterate mouth!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Hari N
Re: Re: Too long...
by Hari N on May 30, 2010 08:02 PM
Idiot Hedonist!

If you had some brains, you would realize that even our solar system did not exist 6 billion years ago! Get a lifer, you backward buffoon!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Praveen Goud
Re: Re: Too long...
by Praveen Goud on May 30, 2010 08:03 PM
There was no forward and backward till independence. All were slaves till then.

Try to see whether you can find any history more than 3000 yrs in India. Forget about 6 billion years which our planet earth too didn't born.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Victor Johri
Re: Re: Re: Too long...
by Victor Johri on May 30, 2010 08:45 PM
Backward and forward slaves.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bak bak
@Chandran Ganapathy - Ambedkar
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 07:53 PM  | Hide replies

why didnt that moron slice other religions into castes??????? why only hinduism???? even in budhism to which he connverted, there are castes....why didnt he give reservations to them.....why didnt he recognize shiyyaas and sunnniiss as separate?????

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Victor Johri
Re: @Chandran Ganapathy - Ambedkar
by Victor Johri on May 30, 2010 07:57 PM
Unlike them High caste Hindus do not allow low castes to enter temples and take water from the same well.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bak bak
Re: Re: @Chandran Ganapathy - Ambedkar
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 08:00 PM
so to get water, he brought in reservations!!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Mukund Kansal
Re: Re: Re: @Chandran Ganapathy - Ambedkar
by Mukund Kansal on May 30, 2010 11:42 PM
yes... if u could understand what it means...f.0.0.l

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bak bak
Re: @Chandran Ganapathy - Ambedkar
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 07:54 PM
why did he specifically target hindus???? did his w.i.f.e run away with a hindu!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Praveen Goud
Re: @Chandran Ganapathy - Ambedkar
by Praveen Goud on May 30, 2010 08:19 PM
Hindu or Hindusim was never a religion. During his time , being an educated guy , might have converted to show his anguish for social discrimation from castes and unify all discriminated castes under Budhism umbrella.

Budhism , by that was exported out of India. Ambedkar, being abroad saw how popular Budhism was in China , Japan, Korean and asian pacific countries. Ambedkar being indian and one of indian caste craved for social support through commnity instead of individualism dominant in Christianity. That could be reason why Ambedkar converted to Budshism instead of Christianity.

Another reason could be to revive Budhism born in India and import it back into India.

Ambedkar could have also tried to unify the socially boycotted people under one umbrella. As Nehru and Gandhi decided for Hindu umbrella, Ambedkar might have prefered Budhism.

Ulitmately, it is the cates which are being forced to accept religions coupled with non-existent Gods.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bak bak
Re: Re: @Chandran Ganapathy - Ambedkar
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 09:02 PM
thats not the point....and when he connverted to budhism, he has no right to poke his dirty nose in hinduism and should have concentrated on budhism!!!! when ambedkar elaborately bifurcated hindus into various castes, why not the xtians, budhism and muslims!!!!! even they have their own castes which are as elaborate as hinduism!!!!! read abt the caste system in other religion in other parts of the world and u will know the muck u r living in....eslam has customized caste system of more than 80 castes!!!!! chrissttianity has about 10 plus!!!! budhism has customized versions of upto 25!!!!! practised with all sincerity in US, UK, mideast, africa, china, europe, etc etc !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
arun krish
Caste for dividing India
by arun krish on May 30, 2010 07:48 PM  | Hide replies

The old rule" Divide & Rule" successfully deployed by the britishers, is taken by Indian politicians from the very beginning Britishers left India after 1947.
In order to promote equality among people , it is a must & should to eliminate caste. I also say that the inequality and discrimination are ill effects of caste based society.Moreover,you can not set high standard of living among the downtrodden by lowering the high standards.
Finally "You can not strenghten the weak by weakening the strong".
B.Arun

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Victor Johri
Re: Caste for dividing India
by Victor Johri on May 30, 2010 07:59 PM
Ban same caste marriage. Caste system will vanish in 15 years.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bak bak
@Hedonist - hindus are casteist!!!
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 07:38 PM  | Hide replies

are shiyyaas, sunnnnis, cathol1ics, pr0testants, d1gambar, swetaaammmmbar, mahaaaayaaaana, theraaaavaaaaada, etc etc etc religions!!!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hedonist
Re: @Hedonist - hindus are casteist!!!
by Hedonist on May 30, 2010 07:42 PM
Anyone who lives in india practises caste wether they r hindus,muslims,cristians and sikhs.
Eg manmohan's caste is sikh khatri

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bak bak
Re: Re: @Hedonist - hindus are casteist!!!
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 07:47 PM
u moron.....read abt the caste system in other religion in other parts of the world and u will know the muck u r living in....eslam has customized caste system of more than 80 castes!!!!! chrissttianity has about 10 plus!!!! budhism has customized versions of upto 25!!!!! practised with all sincerity in US, UK, mideast, africa, china, europe, etc etc !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JustToHammer
Re: @Hedonist - hindus are casteist!!!
by JustToHammer on May 30, 2010 07:49 PM
There is no religion called Hindus. THat shows your ignorance for hatred. Protestants and Catholics are sects or castes under Christianity.

Shiyas and Sunnis are sects under Islam.

India had , has and will have caste system for traditions and rituals may not be for professions.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bak bak
Re: Re: @Hedonist - hindus are casteist!!!
by bak bak on May 30, 2010 08:59 PM
where is it mentioned that eslam and christianity are religions!!!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 314 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message