Re: All taking Congi to grassroot is nothing but gossip.
by Dravid on May 29, 2009 11:12 AM
what about ambanis, birlas, tatas, mahendras... only their sons rule over public investments...
Re: All taking Congi to grassroot is nothing but gossip.
by Shan Shan on May 29, 2009 12:28 PM
Thanks for this update and it is good to see that many young blood are introduced and they accept to work for this country when lucrative jobs avialable in the market. Thier parents experience will bring more value to thier functionaries and we can hope for the best. This is not a bad phenomenon and this tradition is what we needed (at least 50% should continue to do what thier parents do).
Re: All taking Congi to grassroot is nothing but gossip.
by guru iyer on May 29, 2009 01:15 PM
I have a great doubt,
If sons & daughters are getting ministers post, then if KANIMOZHI is not getting minister's post, that means "who is her father? KARUNANIDHI OR SOMEONE ELSE?
Re: All taking Congi to grassroot is nothing but gossip.
by Ganesh Raam on May 29, 2009 10:51 AM
This is Dynastic Politics of "CON"gress You didnt add Farook Abdullah son of SheiK Abdullha Salman Kursdid son of Late President ....etc..etc.... Only God can save this country
Re: All taking Congi to grassroot is nothing but gossip.
by sudhir gullipalli on May 29, 2009 12:06 PM
dushyant singh son of vasundhara raje manvendra singh son of jaswant singh Raghvendra Yeddiyurappa son of karnataka CM BS yeddiyurappa Sukhbirsingh Badal, Punjab CM's son Karuna Shukla neice of former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee varun gandhi son of maneka gandhi
Sikhs getting slaughered in thousands = A MISTAKE. Hindous getting killed in Kashmir = Political problem. Muslims getting killed by a few hundred = Holocaust. Poor protestors getting shot in WB under Left Govt = Misunderstanding.
Banning Parzania in Gujarat = Communal. Banning Da Vinci Code and Jo Bole So Nihaal = Secular.
Kargil Attack = Govt failure. Chinese invasion in 1962 = Unfortunate betrayal.
Reservations in every school and college on caste lines = Secular. Reservations in Minority institutions = Communal.
Fake encounters in Gujarat [Sohrabuddin] = BJP Communalism. Fake encounters under Cong-NCP in Maharashtra [Khwaja Younus] = Police atrocity.
Talking about Hindous and Hindouism appeasment = Communal. Talking about Muslims and Islam = Secular.
BJP freeing 3 terrorists to save 160 Indian hostages = Shameful Congress freeing 4 militants to save just a life of one daughter of I Home minister in Kashmir [Rubina Sayed] = Natural Political dilemma.
Attack on Parliament = BJP ineptitude. Not hanging Afzal Guru the mastermind despite Supreme Court orders = Humanity and Political dilemma.
BJP questioning Islam = Communal. Congress questioning Lord Ramas existance = Clerical Error.
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by Indian NGO on May 29, 2009 10:31 AM
if you want your voice to heard, please climb the Himalayas and start screaming what you have written here. Majority of indians have rejected what you trying to convey,so don't waste your time.
Re: Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by Sardar Patel on May 29, 2009 11:38 AM
SIT expose Fraud NGOs and Teesta Setalvad mischief Amnesty NHRC NMRC NGOs are all frauds worried only about… The recent SIT findings submitted to the Supreme Court exposes the evil designs of certain ‘secularist’ NGOs, and self styled human rights activists.
The SIT, headed by former CBI director, R K Raghavan, along with former DGP C B Satpathy and three senior IPS officers Geetha Johri, Shivanad Jha and Ashish Bhatia, was assigned to enquire into the post-Godhra riots in Gujarat by the Supreme Court. The SIT report has categorically indicted Teesta Setalvad, a self styled human rights activist of tutoring witnesses, cooking up macabre tales of wanton killings and slapping false charges against police officials.
Re: Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by hakim khan on May 29, 2009 11:11 AM
majority of Indian not rejected, only those who are brainwashed by NGOs like you voted for all Pseudos.It`s only a matter of 1 or 2 yeas that those voted for these pseudos and imbecile leaders will realise their mistake and vote in full force in favour of BJP and other real-secular,and national parties.All regional parties will be wiped out.
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by JGN JGN on May 29, 2009 12:33 PM
MODI still can be a KILLER... If MODI the KILLER be the BJP's PM dreamer for next LS election, then no way to reach 100 seats for your Bharatiya Killer Party.
Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by Jetinder Singh on May 29, 2009 11:23 AM
"Dekho Gadha phir Bakwaas karr raha hai" buddy you and the people you represent just LOST.....did u get it, LOST that means LOOSE, FAIL, DEFEAT, HUMILIATION, DISGRACE, EMBARRASSMENT,...SUCKS....You SUCK...ha ha ha "A week PM" and that crazy, bald STRONG PM.....
Re: Re: Seculiarism redefined IN Bharath
by sudhir gullipalli on May 29, 2009 12:09 PM
Manmohan Singh is majboot neta and only congress can provide nirnayak sarkar Jai Ho
The information published by you regarding Chidambaram wishing to appoint PV Bhide as Home Secretary is grossly incorrect. I as an insider can vouch for the fact that Chidambaram was never in favour of Bhide even being appointed as Revenue Secretary when he was Finance Minister. Bhide outwitted Chidambaram by catching hold of Sonia Gandhi through his Sister-in-law who is reportedly a professor in JNU teaching Italian. Therefore Chidambaram had no other option but to accept him as Revenue Secretary. Bhide was completely sidelined by Chidambaram due to lack of understanding of the former on key issues concerning Revenue and worked closely with Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to frame key policies in budget contrary to media highlighting Bhide as the key man
It is essential that DMK ministers are provided with MOS and beauracragts of other states, they will not hesistate to sell the national secrets for money, at this age karuna is trying to build empire ,so be careful with DMK - their hidden agenda is separate Tamil Nadu,
Re: DMK Ministers
by kraft on May 29, 2009 09:45 AM
The PM should scrutinise all the deals of DMK Ministers especially in IT and Telecom. It is better to have good Ministers of State for these DMK ministers so that they act as check to corruption BEFORE it happens. Also, Congress should insist on Karunanidhi sharing power in Tamil nadu in return for support.
Re: DMK Ministers
by Devisri on May 29, 2009 10:24 AM
this will defeat very purpose for which TN minsters have been bargained,by karuna &co.Can MMS has the will to do that,inspite of having clear majority is the question.If MMS had the will , he could have stood firm even before giving more than what the ally deserves and the selcted persons.
